Why do cons continue to lie and say Clinton did absolutely nothing against terrorism?

Question

There are so many ways to attack this lie from pointing out the increase in anti-terrorism spending to pointing out the attack when Clinton tried to kill Osama only to be criticized by Republicans.

I will take the Executive Order route this time. These are the OFFICIAL Executive Orders Clinton signed into law regarding terrorism.
------------

Executive Order 12863, September 13, 1993
Creation of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board to gather intelligence from the various goverment intelligence agencies and make recommendations to the president.
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12863.pdf

Executive Order 12947, January 23, 1995
This order blocks all property and interests of terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle East Peace Process. The attached list includes terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas, and Jihad. The order authorizes the Secretary of State and Treasury to add more groups to the list.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1995_register&docid=fr25ja95-126.pdf

Executive Order 12977, October 19, 1995
Creation of the Interagency Security Committee charged with developing and evaluating increased security standards for all federal buildings.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1995_register&docid=fr24oc95-145.pdf

Executive Order 13015, August 22, 1996
Given the actions of the Taliban in offering safe heaven
Creation of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security, headed by Vice President Gore, to advice the president on matters involving aviation safety and security.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1996_register&docid=fr27au96-129.pdf

Executive Order 13067, November 3, 1997
This order blocks all property and interests of the Sudanese government given that they support international terrorism, slavery, deny religious freedom, constitute a threat to the U.S., etc, etc.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1997_register&docid=fr05no97-126.pdf

Executive Order 12099, August 20, 1998
This order amends Executive Order 12947 by adding Usama bin Ladin, Al-Qaida, Abu Hafs al-Masri, and Rifa'i Ahmad Taha Musa to the terror list. It blocks all property and interests of terrorist groups who threaten the Middle East Peace Process.
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo-980822.htm

Executive Order 13129, July 4, 1999
This Order blocks all property and interests of the Taliban given that they are giving safe haven for Usama bin Ladin and the Al-Qaida organization.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1999_register&docid=fr07jy99-146.pdf

Answer 1

They enjoy to take false facts and report them and state no sources and then they also like to cover up their own misdeeds with further censoring.

Answer 2

Let me guide you on the Path To 9-11:

First start in the White House Oval office...locate the Clinton semen stains on the carpet ...most likely under the desk area....now follow that path for 8 long agonizing years completely ignoring the islamo facist threats...take a few side trips off the path....to lie to federal grand jurys...blow up a few worthless asprin factories and terrorize young interns along the way. Faile to respond to the blowing up of the USS Cole and leave office in disgrace as an impeached president.

Got it?

Answer 3

I wonder if true conservatives believe that.
I love how we approach a decade from the Clinton administrations, and these people are still fixated on him.
I suppose they do this to deflect attention from the massive failures and widespread disenchantment Americans feel towards the Bush Administration and Bush's war.
This war should never have happened - we will continue to pay dearly for it .

Answer 4

very few would desire to have examine this questions and extremely few responded it in spite of the indisputable fact that i'm additionally between them a citizen of united statesa. earlier an Indian as we can not stay a citizen of two international locations simply by fact being American resident we're not from now on Indian yet we can bypass to our mom land for ever and are loose to stay there too loosing all advantages if we live longer i think of , each physique loves peace and hate a place the place there is not any protection . as quickly as I see terrorism is a international situation each physique would desire to play his or her place . whilst Malala a muslim lady can combat for coaching of females ,whilst a new child needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and not loose from its effects ,an afternoon would come whilst human beings would come forward to wipe it from human minds besides the indisputable fact that this is purely too previous due already , there are maximum of potential of destruction to wipe total humanity if needed action isn't taken faster . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all style of violent movies would desire to be faraway from media so as that we don't have get admission to to them by way of any potential . human beings can hire all those video clips for couple dollars and arise to combat with kin then to next neighbor then at paintings then someplace at buying mall ,then anyplace he does not think of excellent extra on via media and factors he can get admission to from cafes and famous individual dollar who provide this freedom so easily . Then we try to calm the techniques that's already bombarded with plenty damaging advice around the globe .

Answer 5

Your being the typical LIBERAL. Actually you are bringing up some very good points but the problem is you are fighting about the PAST. You are RIGHT! So get off the soapbox and do something about the FUTURE.

I get really frustrated when people keep talking about a problem. Screw the problem, we all know what the problem IS let's use our energy to find a SOLUTION to the problem. Are you sure your not a politician?

http://Ray4VP.com lets try something NEW. Instead of talking about problems and who is to blame for the problems and pointing out what someone did 14 YEARS AGO let's do something about the problems.

Answer 6

Passing litigation is a weak way of dealing with an issue, you can't just throw money at the problem and hope it goes away. Clinton took no actual action against the threat.

Answer 7

He failed to act on the first World Trade Center attack and the attack on the USS Cole.
He also pulled out of Somalia when he met opposition making the US military appear weak.

Answer 8

This is the third question which you have posted this morning, on the same subject: Clinton and terrorism. I answered one and suggested you are delusional. After three, I think you are totally wacked out. Clinton did noting about terrorism. I was hear in the US during his eight years in office. He did two things: raised taxes once, and indulged in kinky sex in the White House. Clinton did nothing about terrorism. Nothing, Nothing, Nothing. Repeat, nothing. And that means nothing.

Answer 9

I tell you why because President Clinton acted as the head of a civilized country. He waited got all the facts and caught and prosecuted the criminals. He didn't bomb and kill a few hundred thousand innocent people he went after and caught the perpetrators.

Answer 10

Executive Order Blah Blah Blah.

In other words, a lot of talk, and no action. Unless using million-dollar cruise missiles on empty tents, and killing a security guard at an aspirin factory count as "something."