Silly Hilly said ,I would not have voted for the war,if I knew what I know now,how yellow lame duck is that?

Question

Is this the next pressident of the U,S,A?

chelle,lame duck silly hilly did have the facts,at the time ,she had all the info Bush did,listen if at that time she had any question to the situation,thats the time to ack on it,not after the play is done.if your not shure ,vote no,but she is a lame duck.yellow.its ok ,we are all doomed now anyway,thanks to the Dem,s.I will just push on ,go team red go

Answer 1

exactly of anyone Billary should have been the most informed she just relovcated from the White House and had access to the intell. Shes flip flopping

Answer 2

Hey you could do worse than the liars who said there was a reason. If she had of voted against the war based on the fabricated evidence then she would have been seen as unpatriotic by the same foolish crowd who now question why she voted for the war. Hopefully the Democrats will have enough sense to send someone else, but you could do worse....at least she now admits she was wrong unlike the fool you have as president who still believes he is right while the rest of the world sees different and is picking two more fights...this one will not be happy until he has the draft back and can kill off more young Americans....migod, I just read that McCain is going to be your saviour...anyone hear 200,000 troops...who will give me 3...let me hear 4 who will give me 400,000? and lastly, what does it matter, you are only being entertained no matter who runs because you really do not have a choice they are all the same in the game of U.S. politics...where is the third choice?

Answer 3

I am afraid so.
Watched the odds of who the bext pope was and the line on Ratzinger went from 27-1 down to 4-1.
He was the most bet upon to win and sure enough he did, same thing is happening with Hillary she is by far the betting choice. Some will say that this does not make a difference, but wait and see what will happen. We are almost done for as a nation, bankrupt financially and morally, no vision on how to fix either, we lack the will to get out of this situation.

Will watch the EU, with the German pope take over the role of superpower, we are in trouble as China, Russia and japan will over take us in the near future.

Answer 4

Sounds like an honest statement to me...if she had the facts then that she does now, it would have changed her opinion. One would hope that a reasonable person would change their mind when presented with a different set of circumstances, and would not blindly profess the same unaltered opinion no matter what happened. The first, "flip-flopping" action proclaims rationality, intelligence and deliberation. The second action, maintaining in the face of insurmountable evidence to the contrary bespeaks stubbornness, childishness, vanity and frankly stupidity. I don't think Hillary will be the next president, because I think she's too polarizing, but if she is, I'm glad to know she can consider new evidence when forming her opinion.

Put it like this: I would not have convicted the man, if I knew then what I knew now: somebody else's DNA is all over the scene. Wouldn't you want that person to change their mind, too?

For what it's worth, a lame duck is someone ostensibly in power but whose effectiveness has been undercut. It is NOT a synonym for lame, stupid, pathetic, or anything like that. And I'm VERY curious to hear a good rational argument about how she knew everything then that she does now...perhaps you are suggesting she is clairvoyant and could forsee rampant mismanagement of funds and troops, a commander unwilling to listen to his advisors and generals? Or maybe you suggest that she alone of everyone had the knowledge that the "facts": ties to Al Qaeda, mobile weapons labs, etc. were not actually any more connected to reality than invisible pink unicorns. At the time the war began, I supported the invasion, because I believed these facts to be true. Now I know they are not, therefore I know different things now then I knew then, and therefore my position has changed. If that makes me a (insert insult here...except, please don't try to insult me by calling me a liberal, it only makes you look ineffectual, since I'm proud of that label and not offended at all) then by all means, I'm glad to be one.

Answer 5

Isn't it amazing? ...if she had the facts then that she does now, it would have changed her opinion.....WOW! If she would've known the SAME intel she saw was inacurate.......she would not have voted for the war. Profound! Now, Bush had all the same info-drew the same conclusions as Hill-co and the 'gang'-came to the same concensus to go to war. (Albeit the final decision was GW's.) Now we find the intel was not accurate...........duh!

But that excuse won't work for Bush--because Bush won't apologize for trying to protect us--He as stated it was the proper decision at the time (because of the intel) and he stands by that. Hindsight is 20/20 of course--and we would not have gone to war--we wouldn't have have congressional approval--had we known then what we know now.

Isn't what Hillary saying equivalent to the drunk driver who says, "If I had known the breaks were out, I'd have never driven the car," after he's already killed someone?

The fact is--we went in. We're there and we need to help stabilize the country before we leave.

Answer 6

I can't beleive you don't know what lame duck means, but you are allowed to vote. But I agree that no Democrat who authorized the moron in the white house to invade Iraq deserves any support from voters, for white house or congress.

Answer 7

just so you remember (i'm gonna keep it real here) almost all of americans and their state governments were for this war when it started because we believed we were going to get osama back for 9/11 but wait we didn't even try to find him let alone catch him once bush got the ball rolling he changed the color size and shape of the ball not to mention he lied to us is taking advantage of the rising cost of oil to fatten his pockets and now enough is enough many (hillary isn't the only one to have changed her mind on this issue dolt) of our congress and senate feel the same most of our everyday americans feel the same why you support the killing of innocent women and children not to mention our troops in iraq astounds me slightly hypocritical don't you think because i'm sure your pro life

Answer 8

Don't it just drive you up the wall. When her Followeers. No more look at the facts, than their fearless Leader? Facts are only for those who Vote Republican. Opinions, are what drive the Liberal Mind. Security, be damned! Glad to see you show `em the facts.

Have a Super Weekend!

Answer 9

Not to Worry, she is not going to win, I doubt, if she could
win, anywhere else, other than a handpicked Democratic
stronghold. Would you really vote for this Witch. No!

Answer 10

How lame is the president that lied to his Nation to promote a war based on his greed? Is this YOUR leader, con?