THOUGHT PREDICTOR is posted at http://wwf.edula.com/tp
2007-04-27 21:30:55 · 4 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
it failed and that was why thought predictor arrived as a boon to us.
2007-04-29 09:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by nightingale 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The academic regime never really had an authority over the world. They have been good servants all this while. History talks of Emperors not their Ministers.
Academic Heroes like Einstein or Stephen Hawkins have seemed happy to just throw light on facts and not harness them to derive authority. This trend will survive even the thought predictor because academic workers have never made an attempt to hide their thoughts. If anything the politicians and administrators may have the risk of losing their schemes to their rivals.
2007-04-28 04:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by smartobees 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no integral single academic regime. The authorities in mainstream media are particular individual humans that may or may not have a field or scientific expertise in common.
As your 'thought predictor' has not an ability to formulate new diction syntax to answer particular or peculiar individually different question inputs, it is not a predictor but one of the predicted.
2007-04-28 22:00:03 · answer #3 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you study the obscure to find things to worry about?
2007-04-28 15:12:11 · answer #4 · answered by BANANA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋