2007-04-27 20:35:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Depends how good a wrestler the clone is/ what the storyline is
2007-04-27 20:39:29 · answer #1 · answered by va5ant 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They already did this and it was boring as hell.
Plus, in order to do a real clone, you would have to wait for the Undertaker baby clone to grow up before they could wrestle. The real Undertaker would be like older than 60 by then.
2007-04-28 03:41:01 · answer #2 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A clone has DNA that has aged, so even if a "young" Undertaker clone appeared on the scene, he would likely have gone through an unhealthy childhood and who knows what his response to steroids would have been?
Nevertheless, I'll humor your paradox. The "winner" would be based on a decision which in turn would be based on measured audience response. The one who entertained more would win.
2007-04-28 06:15:57 · answer #3 · answered by Lightbringer 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
this type of match has happenedbefore in 1994 s sumerskam
evil undertaker vs undertaker in which undertaker won after delivering 3 tombstones
2007-04-28 07:00:11 · answer #4 · answered by coolsid_61 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like Kane.
2007-04-28 08:14:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the original undertaker. they had a match @ summerslam 1994.
2007-04-28 03:40:41 · answer #6 · answered by shawn michaels pwns cena 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
there WAS a clon, by Ted Dibiase.. But the match was boring as hell
2007-04-28 19:13:55 · answer #7 · answered by BTII 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its has happened before. the real undertaker won.
2007-04-28 03:52:45 · answer #8 · answered by jtdog1996 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It happened before buddy! how long have you been watching wwe?
2007-04-28 05:15:59 · answer #9 · answered by Raymon R 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
dude u better be like 12 years old....
2007-04-28 03:42:48 · answer #10 · answered by ChiefTokembowl2 p 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋