If she is do you think she'll be a good president? Why or why not?
2007-04-27 19:46:16 · 21 answers · asked by love&fury don't mix 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah I have been living under a rock ok, there now everybody knows!!
2007-04-27 19:56:35 · update #1
Unfortunately, yes she is running, and NO....she would NOT be a good president!!!
She would raise our taxes and subsequently kill what is now a thriving economy. Morover, she would deplete our military setting us up for another terrorist attack on our soil. Also, she would lower our moral and educational standards, while contributing to higher crime rates by infringing upon our 2nd amendment rights as law-abiding citizens to own and carry our guns to protect ourselves from criminals.
2007-04-27 20:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by phil c 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton is running for President. But I don't think she will make a good one. I see her the same way I seen her husband on the politics issue. She just isn't real the way Obama seems to be when he is running. I would vote more for Obama. I don't think Hillary would do our government well to have in office.
2007-04-28 02:52:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
World War I = Woodrow Wilson (democrat!)
World War II = Roosevelt (democrat)
Korean War = Truman (democrat)
Vietnam = Kennedy / Johnson (democrat)
Bosnia = Clinton (democrat)
Somalia = Clinton (democrat)
Haiti = Clinton (democrat)
Lincoln was a Republican. The Dem.s wanted the union disolved and to continue slavery. WW I, President Wilson managed to keep America out of it for how many years? WW II, the republicans had to be dragged into to it kicking and screaming -- Roosevelt's embargo against Japan played heavily into the decision to attack Pearl Harbor. (Not saying I disagree but) his "Lend/Lease Act deal with the Brit.s sure went a long way to drawing us in against the Germans... Korea was a U.N. job... How about Kennedy with Vietnam --escalated by Johnson? It took Nixon to get us out of it...
Generally, it has more often than not been the democrats who got us into war. But then, the "New" liberal generation is too young to know this and has refused to study history. Tell me, do you suppose that if Newt had done Madeline's job, as Nancy has tried to do Condi's, maybe we could have avoided 9/11 all together? Should Nancy have been arrested for impersonating the Sec. of State?
Does this answer your question?????????
2007-04-27 20:00:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Where have you been? No she will not be a good president. She flip flops on almost every issue, she votes whatever is popular in the media at the moment, she has a very evil temper, and considers herself to be of the elite class, meaning she has a narcissistic view of her self! Also and most importantly, she is a socialist, big time and that means bad things for the US! Socialism will and always has failed throughout history!
2007-04-27 19:52:44 · answer #4 · answered by Bunz 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
She has traits that would not make a good President...
She is narcissistic...
Blames others all to easy
Problem finder....not a problem solver...
Leads by opinion polls...not by conviction....
Tries to be a populist...
Always negative....
Too phony...
Known to use ruthless tactics...against her opposition.
Politicians are not perfect...but Senator Clinton represents the worst of Politicians.
That is my reason I cannot in good conscious vote for someone like Senator Clinton.
2007-04-27 20:20:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
She is one of the Democratic candidates currently running for president, and her main opponent is Barrick Obama for the Democratic nomination.
If she is elected, I think she would make an excellet President. One she is intelligent. Which is a vast improvement over what we have now. Two, she is part of a tradition that is a core part of American history, liberalism and progressivism. Which means she's looking ahead to solve problems, rather then to 1850, or to Nazi Germany (Abu Gareb(sp?) = Dachau)
Unfortunately, it is not realistically likely that Clinton will be elected by a strong majority, and possibly not Obama either. As jcfchamp, C J, Bunz, eelfins, have already proved, the Facists in America that say "vote Bush or die, Traitor" won't allow anyone but another Facist to be considered good, and unfortunately, thanks to the domination of the Government by Republicans since LBJ, America is too SEXIST and too RACIST to ever think forward enough to allow anyone but a rich, white man to be elected.
2007-04-27 20:16:04 · answer #6 · answered by Sam N 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Yes, she is running for president.
No - I don't think she would be a very good president. She has a honesty issues that date back to when her husband was president.
2007-04-27 20:02:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it would be good to see a women president in the USA. Anything than the Bushes (I hope their kids don't run in future elections). One two many Bushes are enough. Time for a change.
Hilary, seems a strong leader
2007-04-27 19:57:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Unfortunately yes.
Why do I object? She's a liar, she's corrupt, she's self-serving, she's a die hard liberal, she's against traditional American values, she's anti-Christian, she's anti-2nd Amendment, she's pro-abortion, she's anti-military.........the list goes on.
She is the worst candidate for President I've seen since Al Gore and John Kerry!
2007-04-27 19:49:23 · answer #9 · answered by C J 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
The witch of washington will turn america into a bubbling cauldron of socialism, and then fly screaching into the darkness on her airforce one broom.
2007-04-27 19:56:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋