or would they all be bare bottomed?
I'm an adult.
2007-04-27 18:45:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Well I wouldn't be opposed to it. One rule in our house is that daddy does not spank my bare bottom, but over my jeans instead.
Thank you and good day,
2007-04-27 23:26:38 · answer #1 · answered by Lori 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I might allow you some modesty at first, letting you keep jeans and panties on, but you can rest assured that each will be removed in time, leaving your bare and reddened bottom on display as I conclude your spanking.
2007-04-30 12:18:56 · answer #2 · answered by baka_otaku30 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to see your picture...hehe.
OK, seriously, in the context you're asking, depends on how mad I am. If you were a child, let's say, and I was in a bad mood, and I had a legitimate and strong reason to corporally punish you, then I might do it bare bottomed.
2007-04-27 18:52:19 · answer #3 · answered by lone_star_john 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No way. You're the one who's been naughty, not your pants - why should they get spanked? Besides, I love to see your bottom blush as I spank it.
2007-04-27 22:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no way the only way a spanking should be done is a bare a**
2007-04-27 18:47:36 · answer #5 · answered by sandy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BARE BOTTOM!
no exeptions.
2007-04-27 18:47:54 · answer #6 · answered by The Con 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
always bare bottomed.
2007-04-27 18:54:01 · answer #7 · answered by comic book guy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no no you are a fair skinned redhead. Your pink bottom so beautiful as it turns red, your skin feel so nice , soft and warm. can't feel skin through pants cant see beauty. you naughty girl!
2007-04-27 18:55:16 · answer #8 · answered by KABANGA 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
bare
2007-04-27 18:48:59 · answer #9 · answered by Brian D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of the above
2007-04-27 18:48:56 · answer #10 · answered by jml 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋