In about 20 years or so George Bush will be 80 years old. I am positive he's going to be moping around like Reagan in his "later years" and people will try to make the excuse "His mind is going". Most people who have lived through his presidency will remember, his mind was never there in the first place.
2007-04-27 16:26:47 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I ain't making fun of people with Alzheimers, read the joke more carefully.
2007-04-27 16:44:19 · update #1
HAHA! You hit the nail on the head. How can you miss something you never had in the first place......
The man is as dumb as a box of rocks.....
2007-04-27 16:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
So in 20 years I will be 75, doesn't sound so funny to me but I wish I could have accomplished 1/10th of what President Bush has accomplished. I've been a manager for quite some time and I've learned that if you're satisfying all of the people all of the time; you're not doing your job.
Will anybody remember you in 20 years?
2007-04-27 23:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
As much as I believe Reagan was racist and was a terrible president, I won't make fun of Alzheimer's. It is a terrible disease..
That being said, "dumbaya" will be moping around asking why was he considered the worst president in history.
2007-04-27 23:34:22 · answer #3 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I have to say that I really admire the sensitivity that liberals extend other human beings. We can't call gays "homos" or "fags", and we're supposed to care deeply about the plight of those with Parkinson's, but damn if it isn't funny to laugh about a Republican's Alzheimer's twenty years before he gets it.
Damn, you guys are just moral gods. Do you take off the halo when you sleep or is it something you just get used to?
2007-04-27 23:35:36 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You are right. Just like the quick-witted Pelosi and the persevering Reid, he should have given into the terrorists, right? Cause fighting terrorists is bad, and fighting unborn children is the proper 'choice'.
2007-04-27 23:44:11 · answer #5 · answered by Daniel 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
....just like most people who remembered what Reagan did.
Ironically, Reagan ended the Cold War.
Bush started a fight (in Iraq) he couldn't win.
2007-04-27 23:32:43 · answer #6 · answered by Charlie Bravo 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I still remember watching the news one night and seeing Tom Brokaw act as if he was shocked when he announced that Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's. I had deduced that from his behavior before he was elected to his first term.
And how anyone can have watched Bush for the past six years and not see that he's deranged and delusional is beyond me.
2007-04-27 23:31:13 · answer #7 · answered by frugernity 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋
no hopefully they will realize that he was not a bad president because he isn't. I guess doing nothing after 9/11 would have been what liberals would have wanted, wait they would have complained about that too.
2007-04-27 23:34:32 · answer #8 · answered by Katie B 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Excuse me? Are you implying that Reagan did not have Alzheimers? You are sadly mistaken. Bush ruined his brain with alcohol and drugs. He never should have been allowed to run.
2007-04-27 23:31:06 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Oh yeah....that's hilarious! Making sick jokes about a dead president and a sitting president. You're one funny guy.
2007-04-27 23:32:48 · answer #10 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋