Is this one of the subtle beginnings, a soft-sell start, before it really becomes a hard push with lies and deceit like it did with Iraq?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070428/ap_on_el_pr/on_the2008_trail_62;_ylt=Av6ZQYgOhOxHATiGe6GPGwVpu6cv
2007-04-27 15:31:39 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If IRAN sells its oil in Euros there will be another war.That's what started the Iraq invasion
2007-04-27 15:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
This Iran War is built on as many lies as the Iraq War. Don't believe the Neo-Cons who glorify war. The Iranian People actually hated Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, because they thought it was "anti-American." The Iranians would be strong allies if we'd get rid of our stupid trade embargo. We should trade with them and be civil, because Iran has the heart of a Capitalist nation and we should not attack them.
Congress needs to make war-mongering a felony and impeach Bush if he even dares attack Iran. However, the Democratic frontrunners are "leaving everything on the table", which is a codeword that they are not opposed to nuking Iran. The Democrats better nominate an anti-war candidate, such as Mike Gravel instead of a phony like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.
On the Republican side, there's Congressman Ron Paul whom is probably the best choice in the entire race by far. He's against Iraq and Iran and would just march out of Iraq, unlike the weaklings such as Obama and the monsters such as Giuliani that want more soldiers to die in veign. Congressman Paul also happens to be the number 1 supporter of Capitalism in the Senate, since he is an opponent of all welfare, including welfare for corporations.
The only way this problem is going to end is if the supposed frontrunners are embarrassed in 2008 because none of them care enough to end this war. If the Democrats really care about ending the war, they should pass a law to just march out.
Give the Neo-Cons something to actually whine about. Actually cut-and-run.
2007-04-27 15:44:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Six months ago - on this very forum - I predicted the Bush administration would unconstitutionally and illegally invade Iran, just as it did Iraq - and for the very same reasons: OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.
I still believe that once the Bush handlers can come up with a plausible excuse that 'ditto heads' will 'buy', we could be fighting Iran before the beginning of summer.
We want all that cheap, easily-accessible OIL swimming underneath Iraq and Iran's sands so that Cheney and his Exxon-Mobil buddies can get richer and richer and richer feeding America's addiction on OIL so we can drive around in our $60,000 gas-guzzling SUVs and keep throwing (petroleum-based) plastic bags into landfills. Instead of encouraging Americans to reduce, re-use, and recycle, the Bush administration simply wants to enrich the wealthy elitists and industrialists in our country by allowing such waste and inefficiency to continue. -RKO- 04/27/07
2007-04-27 15:43:37 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would you think GW would want to "sell" you anything? He had plenty of help regarding the situation in Iraq before the invasion. He had thugs like Kerry, Kennedy, Gore, Dean, Clinton, Allbright, and Clinton amongst many lesser known criminals to support the invasion. Then when the going got tough, the wimps backed off. There were no lies or deceit until after the invasion finished and we were trying to win the peace. THAT'S WHEN ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED RATS WERE SCURRYING TO AND FRO TO TRY TO GET SAFELY OFF THE SINKING SHIP. THEY WERE LYING AND CONNIVING AND TRYING TO BLAME OLD GW FOR EVERYTHING. IT WAS ALL THE NEWS CLIPS OF THESE DEMOCOMMIES SPEECHES THAT SHOWED THEIR LIES.
2007-04-27 15:49:04 · answer #4 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, Iran is a greater threat to America than Iraq ever was. The trouble is that we'd probably have to reinstate the draft to increase the armed forces for such an undertaking.
2007-04-27 15:38:22 · answer #5 · answered by midjrsy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why doesn't Bush even consider talks with Iran?
He allowed India to have nukes. He is attempting SOME dialoque with N.Korea. Why is Iran different...because they are our true enemy and Bush coward knows it. He picked the wrong war.
Listen to Leet. He is dead on.
2007-04-27 15:44:19 · answer #6 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hi he's advertising nukes of as a million/2 a dozen he could besides placed a discount for a six p.c.., then he can in basic terms have one receipt and he probable burns the receipt and laughs... *** corrupt company usa...they have kill extra people than the different us of a ever. keep in mind war is in basic terms an excuse for the calculation of sadistic mass homicide!!! putting it frankly!!!
2016-12-16 17:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems like only liberals talk about conservative plans of invading Iran. It's another ploy to gain votes.
2007-04-27 15:35:47 · answer #8 · answered by TE 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nothing would surprise me about this man and his thoughtless actions, and egotism. Best wishes
After all, as he said, "I'm the Decider"
2007-04-27 15:42:34 · answer #9 · answered by tylernmi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He would be doubly foolish to do so, not only will it doom his administration, he will make all GOP members look like mindless warmongers
2007-04-27 15:44:34 · answer #10 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋