Did the 110th Congress of the USA let down the American people by not even debating the order of Impeachment?

Question

Do you think declaring 'Impeachment is off the table' was the right way to handle the portion of US that is so discontent with the decider. Didn't it seem like Congress was giving the impression they were going to 'change things' that were wrong?

Sun & Dum you obviously see things in a different light. I dislike it when adults have to communicate with scorn. You all don't mind the Border Agents getting 12 years or the North American nation? I don't get mad as the lines are drawn. Maybe God needs GB in that the US is not mentioned in the latter days of the Bible.

Answer 1

an impeachment trial would bring out all the dirty laundry on bush ,2/3 of congress would have to vote for it or lose face in their own next election . we must find out the truth of 9-11 . just to many things don't add up on that day . see 'loose change' .

Answer 2

Do the math in the Senate. You need two thirds to remove. You couldn't get two thirds of the Senate to convict a sitting President if he shot someone in front of witnesses (oh wait, that was the Vice President...)

Since the endgame is known, why waste America's time?

Answer 3

Well i think that Harry Reid should be impeached for his acts of treason and links to abramoff but I dont think congress cares unless its a republican

Answer 4

Congress has been extremely lax in it's resposibilities to balance the executive. There has been no balance until recently. The Republicans did no oversight at all. None.

Answer 5

You have to have grounds for Impeachment proceedings...and congress does not have any grounds. You may think so, so get out there and make a differences instead of wasting time asking idiotic questions on yayhoo.

(I meant to mispell, so don't get all bent over the yahoo thing)

Answer 6

yo numb nuts,even the dems aren't that stupid.There is no legal basis for your wet dream.Get over it!