I think it looks much neater than a shirt hanging out (assuming he's wearing a belt). This seems to have been the norm up until the late 80s or early 90s? Why did it change?
2007-04-27 13:39:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
i agree with you. i like a nice tucked in shirt with pants, and a belt. looks more put together.
2007-04-27 18:35:32 · answer #1 · answered by Lisa H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
really, all the communicate over the former few months contained in the adult males's magazines is TUCK YOUR blouse IN!!! regardless of jeans. It seems neater and extra stylish. My rule of thumb is, if there are better buttons sewn contained in the bottom of your blouse, it develop into meant to be tucked in. the hollow does promote those proper classification equipped button down shirts that are meant to be wiped out...they arent as lengthy and performance a finished, bottom button with contrasting shade thread. a number of them actually have Stretch in them. Armani change also makes equipped casual shirts that seem solid untucked (look at the internet web site) My vote might want to be if you're wearing a blouse untucked, get between the equipped shirts, not an outsized interest blouse. then you fairly merely finally end up searching like a fat, sloppy football-dad type. Getting out the iron doesnt damage both. And for informal positioned on, for sure t shirts and polos should be wiped out. regardless of if for employer casual it would want to be perfect to tuck the polo blouse in with chinos or gown pants.
2016-12-04 23:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let us be realistic. If the "normal people" or the 'establishment' stuffs their shirts into their pants, the teenagers who wish to be 'different' will NOT stuff their shirts into their pants.
If the office types suddenly change style and leave their shirts UNSTUFFED, the teenagers who wish to be different will start STUFFING them in immediately. Or wear their underwear on the outside of their pants. Or paint their faces purple. Or shave their heads. Or get piercings, tats, and wear outrageous jewellery. ANYTHING to be 'different'.
Curious thing is, they are ALL so different with these fads, they are ALL the same. How sad.
How about trying to be individuals for once?? That would be DIFFERENT.
2007-04-27 13:52:46 · answer #3 · answered by fiddlesticks9 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably because people found that shirts are more comfortable when they're not tucked in. Also, tucked in is a dressier look than the style these days- unless you're at a formal event.
2007-04-27 13:44:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the style of shirt. i think that it changed because guys wanted to get more comfortable. i think that it looks nice tucked in and hanging out!! Again i think it depends on the style!
2007-04-27 13:44:26 · answer #5 · answered by musicfreak4evr4 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya it looks neater its ok for fancy suits but not casual it looks sorta nerdy(no offense) especially if you are in school still
2007-04-27 13:43:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Where the heck do you live. Shirt hanging out is so 90's.
2007-04-27 13:43:17 · answer #7 · answered by wisemancumth 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
hmm....i like when guys wear the shirt OUTSIDE the pants....inside the pants looks too stuffy and business like
2007-04-27 13:43:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think the stle has changed due to people being lazy, sloppy and trashy... tuck it in bub!!! ill see you at the party!!! ill be the woman dressed to the T
2007-04-27 13:44:03 · answer #9 · answered by kim t 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
cuz it wanted to
2007-04-27 13:42:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋