What is morality?

Question

Morality is, in the end, empty and flimsy, as the torrent that is emotion sweeps over it. As such, it should be understood that everyone has a breaking point before a certain destination is reached (e.g. torture).

Furthermore, what is moral in one culture is disproved of in another. Is there an objective moral standard? Also, why isn't morality evident in the younger generations, who base their habits more on repetitive experience rather than self-thinking?

Do young humans feel justice? Injustice? Morality...

Answer 1

There is no such thing as "good" or "bad" as absolutes. There is no absolute morality, only situational ethics.

Good and Evil are like beauty and ugliness- they are in the eye of the beholder.

For example, take a look at the resent controversy over Richard Gere in India.

He kissed an actress on stage, and that has created a moral outrage in India, since such public displays are considered immoral.

In the United States, kissing is normal and natural- but for Janet Jackson to show her breast, that's a moral outrage.

In Brazil, who cares if a woman is bare breasted- it's normal and natural.

While as I said morals vary, there is *usually* a key core of defining *harm to another* as the root of immorality.

That is why there is so much debate over "victimless crimes" like prostitution, gambling, and drug use.

Killing is immoral because the victim is harmed. Rape is immoral because it goes against the victim's consent. Theft is immoral because the victim takes a financial loss.

As I said, it's usualy, not always- the Nazis thought it was just fine to kill Jews, because they thought it would result in the greater good.

Vegetarians think it's murder to kill animals for food, while others think it's OK.

Even harm is based on individual perspective- thus the debate on topics like abortion, capital punishment, and assisted suicide, since some people think these things cause harm, others do not.

Answer 2

'Do young humans feel justice? Injustice? Morality... '


If anything, more so than the aged cynic.

'Furthermore, what is moral in one culture is disproved of in another. Is there an objective moral standard?'

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc2cc.htm

The Phenomenology of Mind

C: Free Concrete Mind: (BB) Spirit

C: Morality
c. Conscience: The “Beautiful Soul”:
Evil and the Forgiveness of it
"(3) Evil and Forgiveness
Φ 660. While in this way the opposition, into which conscience passes when it acts, finds expression in its inner life, the opposition is at the same time disparity on its outer side, in the sphere of existence — the lack of correspondence of its particular individuality with reference to another individual. Its special peculiarity consists in the fact that the two elements constituting its consciousness — viz. the self and the inherent nature (Ansich) — are unequal in value and significance within it; an inequality in which they are so determined that certainty of self is the essential fact as against the inherent nature, or the universal, which is taken to be merely a moment. Over against this internal determination there thus stands the element of existence, the universal consciousness; for this latter it is rather universality, duty, that is the essential fact, while individuality, which exists for itself and is opposed to the universal, has merely the value of a superseded moment. The first consciousness is held to be Evil by the consciousness which thus stands by the fact of duty, because of the lack of correspondence of its internal subjective life with the universal; and since at the same time the first consciousness declares its act to be congruency with itself, to be duty and conscientiousness it is held by that universal consciousness to be Hypocrisy."

Answer 3

It relies upon on no rely in case you're defining morality in only human words, or no rely in case you have confidence there is an outdoors stress, larger skill, or God, who makes the regulations. If there is this type of being then the morals are those which that being communicates to us. in case you assert you compromise for the training of a particular holy e book as being the divinely inspired words of that being, then the ethical rules and regulations laid out in that e book are those to stay via. If those regulations state that homosexuality is incorrect, then for believers of that faith, it incredibly is incorrect. although, they might desire to persist with the regulations for "a thank you to handle individuals" the two. in case you do not have confidence in any particular God or larger skill, then morality is so plenty greater versatile and you may set it as you pick for. i think of particularly some the project that religious human beings have with homosexuality stem from the minority of very politically-lively gay rights campaigners who've compelled an quite specific awareness of the project into the media, or maybe colleges. perhaps militant homophilia (if there is this type of be conscious) is an equivalent evil with homophobia!

Answer 4

A lot of questions. Morality is basically right and wrong. No there is no gray area. Is murder right or wrong? It is wrong. Why? Because it is immoral to murder (killing without justification).

It wouldn't be right to confuse morality with societal norms. Yes in Iran people get stoned to death for adultery, but adultery is immoral in all societies as a whole, it is just the punishment that we have a problem with. Is the punishment a moral issue?

Answer 5

There is nothing empty or flimsy about morality. Being moral is conducting oneself in the path of truth. Doing right by yourself and others. Secular progressives don't want right or wrong in this society because people would have to take responsiblity for their actions. All people should because it is the moral thing to do. If you don't believe that then, I feel sorry for you.

Answer 6

Morality is merely a social construct that exists to limit the quality of our short existence.

In brief, it's nothing.

Young people feel outrage and satisfaction based entirely on whether or not their interests are being served. We would all be better served to take a page from their books.

Answer 7

there are morals, they are what make us intelligent human beings.
there are the basics:
-it is wrong to kill another human.
-it is wrong to disrespect another's beliefs or self
-it is right to try the hardest you can
-it is right to DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD DO UNTO YOURSELF
now, that being said, most of those are not followed. however, they are universal moral standards. you can't tell me that in some places hard work is frowned upon, for example.
these are my beliefs, i don't really know if i've dug deep enough yet, i'm still contemplating your question to the fullest extent.

Answer 8

The idea of Morality is an attempt to limit or control others.

Love and blessings Don

Answer 9

Morality is not rooted in experience. Is this Rationalism or empiricism?

Answer 10

"Morality" is simply a generalized set of guidelines.

How they are interpreted and manipulated, the perception and translation of them are what causes all of the issues concerning them.