How can an aluminum airplane pulverize a 110 story steel and concrete skyscraper into dust?

Question

More yet...how can the plane get the building to implode perfectly into it's own foot print?

and how come the official story and investigation finally said, "We don't know what happened to building 7."

Finally...Do you think 911 was just another "Operation Northwoods" ?

Answer 1

It can't and didn't and anyone who believes it did is the absolutely worst braindead moron on the planet. Plenty of straight up, down the middle, facts that the idiots of the world just don't want to see. The facts are there. The lies in the official story are there. These sheep are the worst type of humans in the world because they don't think at all. The impact did not blow the insulation off all the floors in the twin towers get real. The fires did not burn down all of the floors. There is no way on this earth that fires melted all of the steel in the twin towers. No way at all. The fires were concentrated on about 10 floors in a 110 story immensly strong steel framed building and there is no way that those fires melted all the steel in those buildings to create a complete collapse the way that it did. You don't even have to be remotely intelligent to realise that. Which only goes to show just how cretinous the believers of the official story really are.

Answer 2

You post this question over and over. Why don't you take a physics course?

No,an aircraft is not "Aluminum". Most aircraft are made from hardened Aluminum Magnesium alloy. It has a very high ignition point, but when it ignites, it burns like a road flare. Throwing water on it only adds oxygen to it.

The WTC being as tall as they were, were built to withstand the force of an aircraft hitting it. It's weakness was that a new force was applied from the top, spreading the building out as the extremely top heavy section came down. It splintered the building from within. Gravity did the rest.

Manhattan is mostly bedrock, that why it supports so many buildings. Being the building was so close, the seismic shock from the WTC coming down weakened the structure to a point were it collapsed.

Your conspiracy theory implies that's hundreds of people had to be involved in such a brutal and heinous act. After all the pain 9/11 caused, and still causes, your sticking a knife back in the wound of all those who lost loved ones and twisting it gleefully.

Answer 3

Standing in front of the World Trade Center on 9-11-01, I can tell you easily how an "aluminum airplane" can pulverize a 100 story steel and concrete skyscraper into dust. Add in the mega gallons of explosive jet fuel etc. and it's easy. I know a burn victims who was in the lobby of the WTC waiting to go up when the first jet crashed. He was burned 75 stories down from the point of impact. Guess you'd had to be there to understand that this event was not some conspiracy theory spin.

Answer 4

I guess you were not watching TV that day or any time in the weeks and months after it. I (and a few 100 million others) watched the whole tragedy unfold in real time. As I recall the airplanes did not pulverize either 110 story building. They knocked huge holes in the structural steel and started fires fueled by thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Hours after the impacts, the fire made it impossible for the impact-damaged and fire-weakened structure to continue to hold up the portion of the building above the breeches. Once those top floors started collapsing into the lower floors, there was no stopping it. As for coming down in their own foot print remember the buildings were solidly anchored to the earth. There was no force to 'tip' them one way or the other. After impact, the only force on them was gravity and gravity pulls straight down.

Answer 5

The airplane was a flying bomb loaded with fuel for a flight to L.A. The explosion was awesome. Why doesn't talk about the plane that hit the Pentagon? How about the one that was taken over by the passengers and forced down in a field in Penna? People are so gullible. This is why the Internet garbage finds an easy home.

Answer 6

The collapse of the twin towers has been satisfactorily explained. The impact and resulting fires from the airplanes weakened the superstructure of the buildings which then collapsed under their own weight. Since gravity pulls downward, it seems only natural that the building would collapse where it stood rather than half a mile away. Perhaps investigators don't know what happened to building 7. And, finally, no, I don't.

Answer 7

Think about it, what was the weight of the plane + the speed that will be about the force that hit the building. The fuel fried the steel so it droped. the fact it's in it's on foot print I expect is the top floors dropped down and it just pancacked.

The aluminum part had little to do with it, could have been wood I expect.

Answer 8

I'm a welder by trade and have extensive knowledge in the constructing and removal of structures. Look at the photos at ground zero before the cleanup crews began. You will see the nubs of what used to be the core columns of each tower sticking up out of the rubble and notice one thing, they are ALL cut at a 30 degree or 45 degree angle. No cleanup crew would dare do that, they would be fired for safety violations and besides that, it takes more time and oxygen/acetylene to cut in that manner. Them buildings were purposely brought down.

Answer 9

3 Strawmen sitting in a tree and you are acting as dumb as can be.


ADD: someone below said "Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement with 911..." ROFLMAO libs are using OBL to support their position. Thats just F'in Great.

Steel did NOT melt Mental Giants. Jet fuel can heat it to a point where it lost more than 50% of its strength.

Anybody ever try to bend a steel rod? Is it easier to bend when heated? There you go dummies.

Do not forget the damage from the planes themselves.

Do not forget that there are not ANY Structural Engineers who think the building were controlled demoed.

The twin towers were a tube design. Outer skeleton of steel with wide open inner space until you got to the core with the 47 inner beams that were HALLOW. Yes thats right dummies the inner beams were hallow not solid.

Answer 10

The plane was flying at over 400 mph....it did NOT cause the collapse. The collapse which resulted in total destruction was caused by thousands of gallons of fuel burnig, which cause the steel to weaken. The weakening steel caused the pancaking of the structure. It did not implode It fell the exact way it was designed, straight down.
No mystery at all.....no conspiracy...get over it already

Answer 11

A plane flying over 500 MPH, fully loaded with jet fuel, can cause a building to fall. The building coming down in its own "foot print" is due to the mass of the building and gravity. As the floors collapse they "pancake" on top of the floor below them. Basic laws of physics.