2007-04-27 12:04:00 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is a fact that Marvin Bush's security firm was in charge of security at not only the WTC buildings, but also at one of the airports where one or more of the planes were "hijacked" from.
I believe there were massive amounts of high explosive in the building. It would take that to literally VAPORIZE people, chairs, desks, computers, and concrete! Only an idiot would think a collapsing building could do this.
2007-04-27 12:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by robinhood 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Marvin was the inept night watchman who was supposed to make sure all 3 buildings where completely empty for 65 straight hours while the demolition crew came in and planted the explosives. He goofed up and let the night janitor, Spider Jenkins into building 7 just 2 hours before the crew was done. Spider, as most people don't know, is the man responsible for enlightening the American public as to how Bush and Cheney where actually behind the 9-11 attacks.
I read it on a blog, therefore it must be true
2007-04-27 12:10:08 · answer #2 · answered by heavysarcasm 4 · 3⤊ 6⤋
None it did not happen.
I cateorgize you with Cho, the VT shooter you are obvisously just as unstable.
ADD: BTW Marvin Bush served on the Board of ONE of the secrity companies for the WTC until June 2000. Thats right one year and 3 months prior to 911 he had no connection whatsover to the security at the WTC.
Man libs get some facts and stop smoking so much crack
ADD: More for you 911 IDIOTS
- No demolition company in the WORLD supports ANYONE who says the Bldgs were demolished with explosives. Also no demolition experts use the term "pull" when referring to controlled demolition with explosives. Only with 1-4 story buildings that are "Pulled" down with tractors and chains.
- The largest controlled demolition was a 30 story building. It took 4 months to install the expolosives and prep the building.
- Controlled demolition causes the bottom of the building to fail first.
- To this day their is not a singal Structural Engineer that supports any theory on the collapse of the WTC except the offical one
- There is not a singal peer reviewed paper on any alternate theories of the buildings collapse. There are dozens for the official story.
- The dogs that were "pulled" (man you libs love that word, must be personnel) were working ADDITIONAL security patrols for the two weeks prior. When they left, that means security returned to NORMAL levels.
Thats right dummies vote the thumb downs when presented with facts. I'll probably be reported to as that usually happens with libs.
Here is how many answers I have reported 0
2007-04-27 12:07:29 · answer #3 · answered by jonepemberton 3 · 7⤊ 5⤋
Ahhhh, didn't Securacom, lose it's security contract at the WTC in 1998 and get replaced by E J Electric co. ?
Didn't Marvin Bush leave the Board of Directors of Securacom in 2000 ?
Marvin Bush was a demolitions expert ??
Where did he get that skill ?
2007-04-27 12:44:30 · answer #4 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He didn't...in 2001, he had no involvement with the World Trade Center. And their weren't any explosives.
The fact that you cite no sources for your charge simply reinforces the fact that you are making it all up.
"I've commented before on the idiocy of the 9-11 "Truth" movement's focus on Marvin Bush, who supposedly provided security for the World Trade Center. In fact, Marvin was apparently on the board of directors of the company that provided security for the World Trade Center, from 1993 until fiscal 2000.
Some of the ditzier folks out there even claim that Securacom had a two-year contract with the World Trade Center that expired on September 10, 2001."
2007-04-27 14:32:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He was head of Securacom the same company that contracted for secuirty at WTC's he pulled the bomb sniffing dogs out 5 days before 9-11.
It's called the protection racket.GWB promises not to blow up people and buildings if we continue to pay him and Cheney billions.
2007-04-27 12:16:28 · answer #6 · answered by andy r 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Exactly what part of the official story don't you believe and what unanswered questions do you have? You should be able to come up with at least one since there are too many unanswered ones. I know what I saw happen, I saw planes fly into the world trade centers, I saw muslims cheering in the streets, I saw people jumping out of the towers to escape the fires, I saw the buildings collapse.
2016-03-18 08:27:12 · answer #7 · answered by Karin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought that was Eli Bush..... Actually, Marvin looks like he would be a good President!
Have you ever found fantastical theories and grandiose lies to actually be real?> Nope, not ever. It would not be possible to keep the level of secrecy needed to pull off any conspiracy here in the US. There are so many leaks in our government to the press, if we were a ship, there'd be more holes than hull.
2007-04-27 12:10:46 · answer #8 · answered by smatthies65 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
No explosives planted means there was no role played by anyone on that day. We were attacked by jihadist terrorists on 9/11 Nancy.
2007-04-27 12:19:45 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Nancy dude... He didn't have a role in the attacks on our country on 9/11. We were attacked by terrorists.
2007-04-27 12:22:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋