Do you like the Designated Hitter?

Question

I do. Why? Because pitchers should stick to pitching and the DH rule is good because it prolongs the careers of good hitters who are old and can't play the field anymore. I hope the NL gets with program someday and adopts the DH rule. Most amateur and minor leagues use the DH.

Answer 1

YES , it should be in both leagues..

Answer 2

I agree with you. It is fun to watch Mike Piazza and Frank Thomas still be contributing parts of teams. I do like the way the NL and AL have different opinions on this though. I feel it keeps it more entertaining. I will always regard the NL as more of a low scoring pitchers league, and the AL as the high powered offensive machines. It seems that even the coaches keep it this way picking defense over offense sometimes in the NL too. But just think of how much better some of these AL pitchers would do if the 9th hitter was a pitcher, not a contact hitter, or a struggling power hitter. On another note, I would love to see Johan Santana in the National League while he is still in his Prime. His numbers would improve and would be a great fit.

Answer 3

I like it, but I also like the NL without it. I don't have a problem with the different rules except that it puts the NL at a big disadvantage in the World Series and interleague play. Lets face it almost all the pitchers are equally inept at hitting whether or not they do it on a regular basis, but having a true DH instead of plugging in a bench player is a big advantage. I don't like that players are starting to be made into DH's at younger and younger ages, but I like that its there. Guys like Ortiz and Travis Hafner wouldn't be the same player without the rule. I do like getting to laugh at some of the pitchers try to hit though. It was great when career AL guys had to do it when interleague first started.

Answer 4

No the DH rule is an abortion. It just allows old men to stay in the game longer. Pitchers should have to bat. That's how the game was designed to be. If it wasn't for the mercenaries at the MLBPA the DH would have been ended years ago.

Answer 5

The designated hitter is a black eye on the game. Players should have to hit and field, and the DH allows certain players to only have to do one of those things. Pre-1973 when there was no DH, many pitchers- Bob Gibson, Tom Seaver, Don Drysdale- were great hitters. It has not only damaged the hitting ability of pitchers, but has kept a couple of careers going prematurely long and has encoruaged certain players- Jason Giambi for one- not to even care about defense.

Answer 6

No, I don't like it, never did like it and here's why.

The game of baseball was originally created with nine players in mind...traditionally, each of the nine players has his specific position to play and each of the nine players plays offense as well as defense.

Offense includes being part of the team in creating situations where runs are scored. The Pitcher, like any of the other players is a "baseball player" and, as such, is supposed to be able to run, throw, catch, and hit the baseball. Anything other than that, like the designated hitter, is an entirely different game.

The game was not designed with "substitutes" or designated hitters in mind, and this addition detracts from the purity of the game.

The American League made a huge mistake by implementing the designated hitter rule and it was only done for one reason...to try and add "something extra" to the game in order to attract more ticket sales...that's it.

I hope that the National League maintains it's common sense and keeps the game unchanged and in it's present traditional format and never incorporates the designator hitter rule.

Answer 7

Doesn't bother me. If it went away I wouldn't miss it, but since the DH has been in the AL for over a third of a century obviously it's not going anywhere.

McDonald's sells hamburgers and cheeseburgers, but no one ever complains that McD should make up its corporate mind, pick one, and stick with just the one sandwich; or that, by having two choices, the "true" burger concept is somehow cheapened and corrupted.

MLB gets to sell two slightly different types of baseball. I find both entertaining.

Answer 8

i also like the dh cuz it helps protect ur pitcher say if ur pitcher hits a batter them the opposing pitcher would take it into his own hands an hit that pitcher an also it keeps pitchers around longer an get more offence the majority of the time

Answer 9

look it up on line in case you want to entice close all the specifics notwithstanding it grow to be truly followed through the yankee league because pitchers at the instantaneous are not sturdy hitters (except for Babe Ruth) and the yankee league needed to spice up the slumping offensive element of the game. It originated in the course of spring practise in 1969 and made that's universal season debut in 1973. on condition that then, that's been followed through in simple terms about all of us (minor and newbie leagues) except the nationwide league. it is also a rule that would not might want to be utilized...yet why might want to you've, say, Verlander hit in lieu of Shefield?

Answer 10

I like the DH. I dont really like the idea of pitchers hitting. When do you ever see a fielder pitching. It has been done but its not something you see everyday. I also like it because then the entire lineup is capable of hitting the ball and hitting it well.

Answer 11

no its not right to see people get paid just to hit.
DH should never even win the MVP either cause they dont do enough to help there team

DH also can kill another pitchers era too in teh NL you get a pitcher which usaly amounts to an easy out
in the AL you can get guys like david ortiz or travis hafner