First off I will have to tell you that I consider myself an independent, so I don't immediately jump on to one side of an argument because of my political alignment. Next I would like to say that I am so sick and tired of hearing or seeing someone post that Bush made up the story of weapons of mass destruction, just so they have an excuse to say we shouldn't be at war. May be he did. May be he didn't. At this point who cares! That wasn't the only reason we went to war and at the time Bush did declare war, most of America regardless of your political views, were on board and in agreement. What pisses me off, is now we have these people saying "Oh, we need to bring our men home because to many people are dying, Iraqi's don't want us their BLAH BLAH BLAH!" My point being, we made a promise to the innocent people of Iraq, the moment we stepped on their shores and started killing people, to make things better for them. We started something and regardless of how long it takes, we have to finish it. If not for their sake, for our own. If you think the other nations of the world look at us badly now, just think of how we are going to measure up in their eyes if we leave now, with things done half assed and their country in ruins. Weither you like Bush or not, he is the president, and with most of America's blessing he went to war. Either support him, or shut your mouth and think about what it really means to be at war, so the next time the issue comes up you are not so eager to jump the gun. I don't particularly care for Bush one way or the other, but I do believe that he is trying to do the best that he can for this country, so in that he still has my support 100%!!!
2007-04-27 12:09:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Danny 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It really doesn't matter rather he made it up or not, that is irrelevant. What is important is that is the public excuse the left is using to cut funding for the war and create a political power grab. The Democrats want a loss in Iraq because they feel that a loss there will give them control of Congress for a couple of decades the same as the loss they caused in Viet Nam by cutting funding..Remember the left isn't interested in the good of America but only in achieving political power at any cost, if it furthers the leftist agenda.
The only reliable non top secret intelligence I have seen is that the WMDs were moved to Lebanon and are under Hezbollah's control at this time.
2007-04-29 07:42:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Agreed.......everybody on the left looks to conveniently forget approximately, non-withstanding the conventional contract per intelligence amassed via the finished international intelligence community, that Saddam possessed WMD's, all the great ten countries or maybe the U. S. (Former President Clinton to boot.) that Saddam's WMD 's have been nonetheless in Iraq. The UN might desire to not, does not, or grew to become into unable to account for all the WMD's that the U. S., u.s., France, Germany, and uk actually GAVE to Iraq (ET AL) interior the early 70's and eighty's. those WMD's have been additionally manifested via the UN risk-free practices Council and their inspectors. the project is that Saddam ceased destruction of those WMD's and kicked the UN out. those comparable WMD's have not been accounted for. Be that because it may, the Iraqi human beings persistently appealed to the rustic for liberation and the U. S. introduced. it incredibly is now as much as the Iraqi human beings to take administration of their united states of america and if meaning civil conflict, then so be it, yet i might want to work out the U. S. set their very own "time table" and tell the Iraqi PM to "Roger-up," because of fact we are approximately to bypass away the development. no rely if the DNC, Liberals, doves, trust the conflict or not, our troops, our united states of america, and our President, will take the conflict to terrorist in any venue mandatory to make particular our survival as a united states of america and a human beings. Apathy, appeasement, indifference, and indecision, are unforgivable sins. Edit #a million: I in simple terms examine the respond from ccguy & he nailed this one! (Thumbs up!)
2016-10-30 11:17:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course there were WMDs. Given all the time Saddam had to move them out of Iraq (probably to Syria) before we actually arrived. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the UN for giving Saddam the head start.
2007-04-27 22:12:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Black Tomorrow 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
He did not make up the WMD story. There are those out there that think that we're too absent minded to remember that the topic came up long before Bush was President.
2007-04-28 11:20:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mike W 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think he really thought that Iraq had WMDs, but he is the President and Commander in Chief. Therefore, it was his responsibility to make absolutely sure that they did before he invaded them. He's human and he made a mistake. Now, he needs to correct it. Personally, I think he relied too much on the input of Cheney. Cheney is the one who has profited the most from the Iraqi invasion. (Hallibuton)
2007-04-27 11:51:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The WMD story was just a convenient "smoke screen"- that everybody swallowed so that Bush could go into Iraq & look like a National Hero. Who started the story- is irrelevant. Bush was bound & determined to go into Iraq from the get-go, so he would've found some excuse to invade Iraq. It's a CLASSIC example of the saying, "Be carefull what you ask for..." :)
2007-04-27 11:12:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yoy my fine feathered friends have obviously not come into contact with reality..If you cannot see the destructive personality of this president Bush, then there is definitely something very wrong with you, and with the way you absorb the stimuli of reality..There are young men in Iraq from America who shouldn't even be over there. It is true, there were never WMD and most of us know that this President bush knew there were never any weapons of mass destruction. This Presiding President is dangerous and the only way he can be stopped is if the devil gives him a break, and that is not going to happen because it is quite obvious what this man is up to.
2007-04-27 11:02:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pink Honey 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
No.
Bush already has a belief system that can not be challenged by other beliefs. That the political war that been going on with both parties in control, my belief against your belief. And each other says that the others is a liar, which is interesting. Saddam did play into this with having no inspector come into areas that he baned-ed the inspectors from, and also which now we'll never actually know why (unless other secrets are being kept from us).
2007-04-27 11:27:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by ruggedwarrior_love 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of course not . It's just an easy one for them to remember when they begin their Bush-bashing day ..happy libs , aren't they ? Facts don't mean nothing when you've got fairy-tales in libland .
2007-04-27 11:59:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋