I believe it will be the answer for their ineffectiveness for the next eight years.
2007-04-27 09:42:44 · 17 answers · asked by Funnyaccountant 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Of course, when Democrats elect an idiot president in 2008 who doesn't know sqwat about Forigen policy, and allows the next terrorists cell to kill thousands of more people, Democrats will blame Bush. They will also blame him about anything to do with funding.
2007-04-27 10:28:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will they be right? The next 8-10 years will be used repairing what Bush has done with his terms in office. The only thing they could do is try to return America to it's good old Clinton years when we were prosperous and didn't worry about so many things going wrong. It's not Bush bashing, it's merely pointing out all of his flaws and wrong doings. There just are so many that it seems like people are bashing him but they're really not.I'm not a Democrat nor a Liberal, I don't have a party preference and I really don't approve of the way our president is handling things in office. The democrats have a better chance of improving the US than destroying it because we're already destroyed, So what do you think?
2007-04-27 09:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Shia 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Do the Republicans still bash Bill Clinton. Of course, we Democrats will never master the art of hating like you Republicans have.
2007-04-27 10:31:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anword 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But of course. They didn't like it when bashed Clinton after his fall but it's OK to bash Bush after his success.
Typical liberal thinking.
2007-04-27 11:32:20 · answer #4 · answered by Erik A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are still bashing Reagan and the repubs are still bashing Clinton. So, yes. They will still bash Bush.
2007-04-27 09:46:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mark B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I believe he will be bashed for the fact that he is for the rich people and has got our poor people in a mess. the minimum wages that has been granted does not cover the prices that has risen so high.
2007-04-27 10:48:45 · answer #6 · answered by netta2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
8 years? Try 80 years. They will still be talking about the 2000 election long after everyone involved is dead.
2007-04-27 12:07:11 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Republicans still blame Clinton for many things and, while blaming the predecessor can be diverting, it does not solve existing problems.
2007-04-27 09:51:40 · answer #8 · answered by kearneyconsulting 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely !!! I listen to Rech Limball every day. ( KNOW THY ENEMY ) and he spends at least 10 minutes of his daily show bashing Clinton. Clinton has been gone for 6 years. Rush needs some new material for his fair and balanced reports LOL
2007-04-27 09:58:17 · answer #9 · answered by mjbussard@sbcglobal.net 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Just like the Reps. are still bashing Clinton, still blaming him for America's short fallings.
2007-04-27 09:46:08 · answer #10 · answered by It's Me 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋