Have any conservatives asking about surrender actually read the bills passed by the house and senate?

Question

Which part, specifically, do you believe constitutes surrender?

Recruit - The bill actually provides more money for the soldiers than Bush asked for. How is that not providing for them?

Steddy - The bill sets goals for the Iraqi government and our military to reach. If things are going well, they are not removed. Benchmarks. How is this oversight surrender?

badjans - I don't think the US has ever put up with aggression from another country, do you?

Heart & Troll, isn't the timetable there if and only if the Iraqi government continues to fail in its obligations? How is that surrender?

Answer 1

In case you've never noticed, the neo-cons have never even read the Constitution. Do you really expect them to read the funding bill?

Answer 2

Actually yes and you are correct it is a troop withdrawl. i do find it interesting that some funding for the military was attached to the bill. Possibly so Democrats can say that Bush doesn't support the troops after he vetos it?

Answer 3

heres a question for you...how many times will america put up with this aggresive action from other countries until we get mad enough to do whats right for america, instead of asking what we did to offend another country...???
every other country in the world does what it figures is right for their own country and damm the rest...only america is supposed to be the country that concedes we are wrong on most issues and give in to demands that undermine america ...i say from this moment on,we let the world know that we are making agreements in americas interests...and if that coincides with other countries interests , then good, if not, then too bad, we still insist on whats good for america....

Answer 4

A timetable for withdrawal.

War is a contest of wills. When you lose your will, you decide to leave, you *HAVE* lost. Our Army has not "lost", as the weak Harry Reid suggests. Harry Reid has *LOST* his will.
He is ready to surrender the field of battle to the enemy, Islamists, Iran, Al Qaeda...they will own that area if we leave, Reid wants to surrender it to them.

Surrender. Harry Reid wants it, and you buy it.

Answer 5

The Democrats not only surrendered to terrorists, they funded terrorists.

Answer 6

Leaving, before the job is done. Hate my answer all you want, but I'll wager any amount of money that we're back there within ten years.

Answer 7

Of course they didn't...Conservatives are great at jumping to conclusions and then making the wrong decisions based on inadequate knowledge. If this wasn't the case we wouldn't be in Iraq. No one is or was against our invasion of Afghanistan (to go after Bin Laden) and where we should have maintained our focus. No one really seems to talk about Afghanistan anymore but we're in a war there, too.

Answer 8

when we leave what do you think will happen to all of those iraqis that assisted in fighting against islamo-fascism?

Answer 9

The Republican party is playing political games. Democrats are thinking about the 600,000 innocent people that have been killed because of Bush's illegal war! What do they not understand about NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! If it's not bad enough that we believed the lies that brought us to war now they're lying to yourselves about why we should stay!

Answer 10

No, of course not.

Take it on faith, cons (and all the Bushiots) don't have to read anything to know what constitutes surrender. If the RNC (Republican National Committee) says it's surrender, then it's surrender, by jiminy.