Can you name the major thing Republicans put on Clinton's plate during the latter part of his Presidency that might have kept him distracted and unable to focus his attention on his job?
Give up?
Answer: A trial about his sex life.
So have we learned that perhaps digging into the sexual habits of a sitting President is a bad idea?
2007-04-27 08:38:32 · 16 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually, netjr, I didn't mention the word impeachment.
I was talking about the investigation into his sex life, not his impeachment. Your illiteracy is what's sad.
2007-04-27 08:42:55 · update #1
Butterbar: Yes, and Bush did SUCH a good job keeping terrorists from attacking this country, didn't he?
2007-04-30 01:51:54 · update #2
Those who have pressured the American Public to stay our eyes and ears on the Clinton-Lewinsky affair day in and day out instead of letting Clinton and the government concentrate on America's Security Problems, are culprits for making it easy for the 9/11 terrorists to plan their hits without being caught before their jobs were done. And those fools who created the rave to give reason for the media to hail marriage infidelty and sexual trash as more important than other American issues are just as responsible for letting America be a safe and easy haven/target for terrorists to blow us all up.
Haven't anyone notices the several media ankors and clowns whose silliness cable TV stations employ merelyt to disrupt attention to more important and finer American issues, by stirring up the lesser imprtant issues and trash in front of the TV cameras?
2007-04-27 08:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
yeah whatever you say. lol He did nothing when Bin Ladin was offered to him on a silver platter at least twice He stuck his finger in the wind and decided that it wouldn't help his legacy so he didn't think the risk of public opinion being negative on the issue was worth the risk. Did nothing when the USS. Cole was attacked. Only time he did attack was to divert attention from his trial when he bombed an aspirin factory and killed the janitor. And the topper to me was Hillary (the great hope of your party) going on national TV and saying her hubby being accused of having sex with a young intern in the white house was part of a vast right wing conspiracy. You people amaze me you whine about Bush's tax cuts for the rich but if you look up the records at the Library of Congress website you will see that your hero slick Willie actually raised taxes on the middle class and lowered taxes on the rich more then Bush did lol
2007-04-27 08:55:45 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If jesus grew to become into this type of wonderful messiah then why is my checking account empty? I dont think of 'Clintons' is an suited be conscious. Hillary never dealt with forgien coverage whilst invoice grew to become into prez. invoice actually made great progression interior the middle east, greater suitable than all people can assume. He even have been given many countries to finially open diplomatic family with Israel. It grew to become right into a quick era of relative stability interior the middle east. stability is undesirable for terrorist recruiting. Bush can infrequently be blamed for what handed off the two, because of fact we weren't attacked via a united states of america yet a rogue terrorist team, a tiny minority. human beings like that are everywhere. might to boot blame george washington for eric rudolph.
2016-10-30 11:02:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying Clinton was unable to think about anything else but his sex life? Hell, anyone could have told you that! He's a horn dog. I'm just surprised the Republicans didn't bust him for the rape he committed back back in 1978 (read Hilliary's book).
Compared to getting a piece of a$$, USS Cole, Kosovo, White water, attempted bombing of the World Trade Center, Osama, etc. wasn't as important to Clinton as his sex life.
2007-04-27 08:56:41 · answer #4 · answered by David C 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Alright you condescending liberal Clintonite. What about the first bombing of the world trade center? He did NOTHING!! What about the attack on the USS Cole? He did nothing. What about Mogadishu Somalia? When our Black hawks were shot down and our men were dragged through the streets while the Rangers were pinned down what did Clinton do? He sold them out! The Marines at MACS Kaneohe Bay Where ready to strike. We could have been on the ground and in combat within 12 hrs...Clinton ordered us to stand down..Why?!!! Public Opinion! Clinton killed those men and spat on there memory by ordering our men out of Somalia! But what else could we expect from a pot smoking draft dodger...
2007-04-27 08:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There was no trial about his sex life. Investigation into his criminal activities started a year before Monica. However, due to his incredibly skillful (it pains me to say it) legal maneuvering (ie removing witnesses to other countries --"I don't recall" used 217 times during Paula Jones)--the slime bag, promises of pardons for FRIENDS COMITTING PERJURY which he solicited), the inept Starr could only convict on the perjury because we had the physical evidence to back it up. The trial sweet cheeks, was about his crimes-not about sex. No matter how many times you try and tell the world that it was about sex..........(we don't care how or when or by whom he is "Lewinskied").......we're not going to forget WHITEWATER, FILEGATE, TRAVELGATE, IRS AUDITS OF HIS ENEMIES (imagine how that happened when Hillary's college roommate was head of IRS?) PERJURY, SUBORNING PERJURY etc, etc, etc.............
2007-04-27 08:49:11 · answer #6 · answered by Cherie 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you cant stay focused on whats best for America and are to concerned about your on A** then you don't need to be the President.
2007-04-27 08:47:24 · answer #7 · answered by hazard to your heath 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course, you couldn't possibly blame him for that, could you? Turning him into a victim? Hilarious.
It simply occurs to me that if someone wants to be taken seriously as a leader, they should have some control over their libido.
2007-04-27 08:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton was not the president on 9-11-2001, George W. Bush was, the buck stops with him, incompetent or not, the president has to take responsibility for his inaction and his subsequent actions to take America in the wrong direction.
2007-04-27 08:46:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
I could have cared less who he boned look at all the criminal activity BUSH has gotten away with! Has the media went after him the way they hounded Clinton?
2007-04-27 08:42:41 · answer #10 · answered by perrrfection 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋