Is al Qaeda associated with Saddam or bin Laden?
Are the Taliban forces that U.S. soldiers continue to fight in Afghanistan, with Iraq, and the former dictator,
or, are they with the worlds number one terrorist and mastermind of 9-11, where he continues to be proteced in Pakistan?
2007-04-27 08:02:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That' issue's BEEN settled. All the evidence--including the assesments of US intelligence analysts--is that saddam had no ties to al-Qaida and no involvement in 9/11.
2007-04-27 08:09:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
They worked for Osama, in the story as I have now. Al Qaeda is associated with Bin Laden. There are suggestions that Sadam funded some vague terrorists somewhere, but good like finding where those rumors originate, or if there's any truth to them.
Taliban were the ruling group in Afgahnistan, i don't think they expected to fight the US, I'm not sure what banner the Afgahn resistors rally under. Many upper crust Taliban probably left if they had the means. Osama or his organization is more likely to stay because they believe they're fighting a cause. The taliban will just figure there's no profit it's dangerous time to go.
Many people went all over to seek protection, Pakistan, Iraq(?), Seol, they went to guam. Some who didn't go too far, like they went to pakistan, met up with thier brothers and decided to go back in to find or help somebody or something. I see the whole resistance movement as a loose affiliation of people following different paths. It's very secret and personal.
2007-04-27 08:23:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks and is behind al Qaeda as well, Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Saddam's demise was because of the unnecessary deaths of his own people, and he was found guilty by his own peers for crimes against humanity and was hung for those crimes. The Taliban are not associated with Iraq, and I really don't know if the Pakistani's are protecting bin Laden, they keep saying he's not in their country, maybe they are, maybe they aren't...if they are, there will be repercussions to pay for that, but I believe he's being protected in his own country.
2007-04-27 08:20:43 · answer #3 · answered by robotchic 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We went over to Afganistan to overthrow the Taliban and find Bin Ladin. We've done half of that so far but Bin Ladin is one man and that is a huge area over there.
We went over to Iraq because Saddam wasnt cooperating with the UN and there was evidence that suggested he had WMD's, was willing to share his technology with Al Queda, and possibly a nuclear project. Saddam was a tyrant that had to go whether 9/11 happened or not but Iraq has also become a crucial step to the war on terror because we cannot allow Al Queda to sieze the 2nd largest oil fields over there.
2007-04-27 08:24:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama Bin Laden is who they worked for. Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. In fact the two men couldn't stand each other.
2007-04-27 08:08:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Saddam was not associated with bin Laden or the Al Qaeda who were the plotters and executors of the 911 event.
2007-04-27 08:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
both! Saddam may have not been in touch without delay with 9-11, yet he genuinely had his fingers specially communities, or perhaps supported some forms of terrorism by proxy! it truly is thoroughly logical for us to overthrow him and his "GOV" to position us strategically contained in the realm and paintings on neutralizing particular communities to extra forestall terrorist attacks, both contained in the Mideast and in a overseas us of a. Iran helps terrorism, if in basic terms monetarily, or by proxy, and each and each body knows that both Iran and Iraq have a mixed populous of each others countrymen, so why might want to every person trust that Iraq grow to be no longer a hotbed of terror help? we may be stupid to stroll into Iran and do what we did in Iraq, yet being in Iraq is the subsequent ideal component, by putting us proper contained in the approach all of it. If we are to strive against terrorism, Iraq is/grow to be the position to commence, as well Afghanistan it quite is (The Taliban), who were/are in charge for 9-11.
2016-10-18 04:14:11 · answer #7 · answered by nedeau 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ther terrorist organization responsible for 9/11 was not conected wit Iraq at all.
The real persons they were working for was Bush and Cheney.
2007-04-27 08:16:44 · answer #8 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
OBL, didn't you see the vids? He praised their job and said they knew nothing until they got on the plane. He's now dead for it. If you don't like it, tough. He's dead and gone so put your candle in the window for him if you like and even the lie allah couldn't bring him back now.
2007-04-27 09:40:42 · answer #9 · answered by Kevin A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
C. none of the above
D. George Bush
2007-04-27 08:12:49 · answer #10 · answered by autumn 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋