2007-04-27 07:23:00 · 5 answers · asked by Jay baby 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
Uranium is a little bit of all three. Uranium does not exist in nature in its pure form, so you need to mine uranium ores first, then process the ore to extract uranium, and finally, get it to the right isotope content. The ore deposit is definitely land, but without labor and capital, you can't get uranium out of it...
2007-04-27 08:35:18 · answer #1 · answered by NC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uranium can not be regarded either as Capital or Labour. It is normally to be regarded as a raw material purchase. However from the National/ World point of view it can be regarded as Land.
2007-04-27 14:32:34 · answer #2 · answered by sensekonomikx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe uranium would be a natural resource. Economically speaking I guess it would be a capital resource snd marketed on commodities.
2007-04-27 14:27:35 · answer #3 · answered by Alchemist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's land.
Land includes natural resources such as iron ore, oil and uranium.
2007-04-27 14:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by Bjorkmeister 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A commodity.
2007-04-27 14:26:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋