English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Must be sound of music, I throw up at the thought of it.

2007-04-27 04:48:03 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 1

Saw 3 coz a woman had to be taken to hospital and treated for shock when she saw it during the opening weekend. Her own fault. If you were that soft you wouldn't go and see a film like that. Nothing like that happened with Hostel - which ain't a bad film by the way.

2007-04-27 04:54:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Im pretty sure it was Hostel, although Saw 3 was banned in a few countries. Maybe that's what people are thinking about?

2007-04-27 04:40:34 · answer #3 · answered by Maggie J 2 · 3 0

saw 3

2007-04-27 04:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It was not Saw 3.

It was Hostel.


Edit: Why is everyone saying Saw 3? Did they see the news at all?

It was absolutely 100% HOSTEL!!!!!!!!!

2007-04-27 04:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by ♦ Tiff ♦ 6 · 7 1

Saw 3 I think

2007-04-27 04:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Tilly 5 · 0 3

Yes it was definately SAW 3 didnt make me want to throw up though.

2007-04-27 04:53:50 · answer #7 · answered by TS100N 6 · 0 2

It was Saw 3.
When i watched it though it didn't make me throw up thought it just a basic film really,unless it was bad and I'm just sick?

2007-04-27 04:35:51 · answer #8 · answered by shadowstormemily 2 · 0 3

When the original 'Exorcist' came out some theatres gave you a 'barf' bag with your ticket... ;-)

But 'Hostel' is the one you're looking for.

2007-04-27 05:32:46 · answer #9 · answered by Army Of Machines (Wi-Semper-Fi)! 7 · 1 0

Probably Hostel though that movie was just stupid not gross or scary.


Let's get the hell outta Prague!

2007-04-27 04:36:57 · answer #10 · answered by Rob 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers