For the record, I hate biased liberal media as much as I hate Fox. Truthout and Moveon (which hardly even qualify as traditional media outlets) tell blatant lies, the same as Fox. NPR doesn't tell outright lies, but they do broadcast news stories from a ridiculous left-wing perspective that is appreciated by very few Americans. They also give airplay to a lot of ridiculous left-wing crap that doesn't even really qualify as news. I don't even like the New York Times very much. As one of the nation's leading news sources, they make an effort to be objective, but it's not enough. Think if it as NPR lite.
That said, nothing is worse than Fox. The left-wing media is annoying, but it's lies and exaggerations don't kill anyone. Fox allows this administration to perpetuate its lethal bullsh*t. When Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, and Rumsfeld are facing the firing squad, I want to see Murdoch, Ailes, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Hume right next to them.
2007-04-27
04:19:35
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Differing viewpoints and differing interpretations are fine. I'm all for it. Fox does not offer a different viewpoint. It offers lies, deceptions, and untruths. Moveon and Truthout do exactly the same thing and are no better.
You can call the Iraqi opposition "terrorists". You can call the Iraqi opposition "freedom fighters". Those are differing viewpoints. You can't say, "US soldiers are safer in Iraq than they would be if they were in California". This is not a differing viewpoint. It is a lie. Moreover, it is a stupid lie that would only be believed by a moron. Anyone out there think that the soldiers are safer inIraq than in California? Just checking.
I would like to see news organizations be held to some kind of standard. The organizations on the far left and the far right just make up a bunch of crap. It doesn't serve any purpose other than to polarize the US even more than it already is.
2007-04-27
05:20:27 ·
update #1