Why Didn't Barak Obama Answer What He Determines To Be Mission Complete ?

Question

And listen Democrats , you want to play hard-ball with a sitting President during a war ? Well then it's time your candidates are held accountable too !! Barak was asked a direct question . He never answered it . But he did go on a ramble about 'we need to increase the size of our troop-strength so that units don't have to be rotated back into combat as often ' . What the heck is that ? Is he proposing a Draft ? Or does he have a Magic-Wand to get more people to enlist ?

I'd Love to see some rational answers to these questions ?

Answer 1

The Communist's are invested in Americas Military Defeat, therefore they have no Plan, except Surrender !
Be Blessed in Christ Jesus !
Outraged

Edit : Those who assert that we are assisting one side in a Civil War; is that not what Clinton did when he attacked Serbia ? Slobodan Milosevic was the Abraham Lincoln of Serbia, but we attacked him, and helped Kosovo secede. You cannot have your cake, and eat it too !

Answer 2

That wasn't even an official debate. It was a state run debate and the real ones don't start until June.

There are certain questions that aren't always going to be answered directly, and especially not this early in the race.

When you're this far away from the primaries, as a politician, the last thing you want to do is alienate potential voters.

He needs to get his name out there more since he had just about 0 name recognition outside of Illinois coming into this thing.

You just don't tackle polarizing questions this early in the race especially when you're trying to lure more voters in.

The idea is to win people over at first w/o causing too many waves, then once the primaries are close, you become more specific and answer questions that could have turned voters away early. But since you've already reeled them in, less will jump ship at that point.

This is pretty typical of someone who doesn't have a large following of base supporters.

You morons need to stick to topics in which you actually have an understanding of what's going on...like bombing abortion clinics.

It's fairly obvious that the other people answering haven't a clue when it comes to politics. I'd be happy to tutor you guys, but it's gonna cost ya $25/hr. It's a small price to pay to actually become informed for the first time in your lives. ;)

Answer 3

I didn't see the debate so take that into consdieration when reading this...I have yet to hear a clear answer from the President or any other Republican on what vicotry in Iraq is. First it was WMD and the removal of bad guy. Then it was againt the terrorsit roots that suddenly sprang up there, then democracy, now to try to protect against a civil war. It was when the Iraqis step up we'll stand down. They are standing now, they have an elected goverment of people we chose and put into place. These people actaully don't want us there now, they are grateful for the removal of a harsh leader. I am not saying it is time to bug out, but this is no longer a millitary operation and it is killing troops needlessly. There is no millitary soultion to this problem, if any solution.

Answer 4

WOW! What might desire to be pronounced? This has the makings of a huge feud that would desire to wish to very final for a useful at the same time as. Seeing Flanders beat the Mayor to a pulp with the sledge hammer hurted even questioning approximately it. I even have some ideas now which will now fairly plenty make up lots of the fits for my fable Wrestlemania coach which u will see contained interior the appearance weeks. sounds like Grover has somebody else to think of of roughly as properly Kool help guy. And the womrn's gauntlet sounds great. a remarkable activity.

Answer 5

First, he doesn't have a clue. Second, he is in the America must lose in Iraq, catastrophicly, if possible, so we can win the White House in '08 mode.
That is HIS mission. To h--- with the consequences for America overall.
No candidate is going to commit seriously to any other position lest it be used against them later.

Answer 6

Barak is a true politician. He does not want to create waves with republican voters or with pro war Democrats. This is why they say "politically correct" answer.

"We are one signature away from pulling out from Iraq" he said. Now he appears that he is bringing peace, bringing the war to the end. Still no word about what he thinks about war status complete. Well done senator... I think we still need to know what is your position on this issue...

Great question!

Answer 7

Hillary's strategist Laura Schwartz was talking about what a wonderful job all the dems did. She said because of time constraints this was more of a 'git to know ya' so there was little time to talk about plans for the future of our country.

So, I assume once the candidates 'git to know' what Q's will be asked, they will have someone write them an answer.

Answer 8

Senator Obama couldn't answer the question. Because the Polling Data had not come in on what to say. It's plainly written on one of the first pages of their Playbook.

Answer 9

Because WHAT is the easy answer there?There is none.We are in a deplorable situation.Whether you see it or not Iraq is in a civil war.HOW do you fight a Civil War FOR another country?How do you think our military feels thinking they are losing the war?If the entire country would stand up and say "Ok Iraq is in civil war our troops have done their part now the Iraqi need to do theirs.Time for us to leave and let them decide their fate.Good job guys you are winners."Don't you think they would feel like winners?Rather than losers?So who does more damage to our troops?Those who say stay or those who say ok we won.Bye.If the iraqi government turns out to be worth a return to rebuild fine if they don't screw em.

Answer 10

Keeping residual troops in Iraq.

As if some of the Bush supporters have rational answers to this post as well.