...of some smaller, weaker, country's civil war right now with more deaths now more than any other time of bush's reign?
2007-04-27 03:09:03 · 21 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I doubt it, being Gore isn't an "oil" man.
2007-04-27 04:35:42 · answer #1 · answered by سيف الله بطل جهاد 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, we would probably still be "negotiating" with a much larger and more powerful Al Qaeda (a group that has considered itself at war with America, known to them as "the great satin", and has flatly declared their goal as making America cease to exist) and Saddam Hussein would be alive and well and in control of Kuwait, which would give him control of the lions share of the world's oil supply plus control of one of the worlds most important seaports for shipping oil to the rest of the world. I suspect that in that situation other customers (like China) would be given very attractive pricing while America would be forced to pay through the nose.
Yep, your darned right it's about oil, but not in the way that most people believe.
2007-04-27 03:18:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
As far as the current situation and outcome is concerned, I'm not sure; but I do think that Gore is more of a Pacifist than the current war-mongering president is.
2007-04-27 03:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by Bunny Lebowski 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Gore did take his rightful office, as former Vice President of the United States.
What part of "he didn't accumulate enough electoral votes to win the Presidency" don't you understand. Try taking one of those online Civics Classes and you may be able to learn how the electoral process works in America. Most of us got it in 5th Grade.
2007-04-27 03:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could
be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this board is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
2007-04-27 03:33:19 · answer #5 · answered by Cherie 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Too bad for Democrats the Electoral College system is used to elect presidents, not popular vote.
It is pathetic that some of you are still grasping at this "Bush wasn't really elected" crap.
If you don't like the current system, talk to your Congressman
2007-04-27 03:15:16 · answer #6 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
certain our economic equipment and agencies might want to be stuck in a quagmire of lunatic environmental regulations that mightchronic more advantageous agencies to Asia and Mexico and placed tens of millions of human beings out of work. Al Quaeda might want to have struck 3 or 4 more advantageous circumstances even as Gore might want to be feted at Hollywood activities.
2016-11-28 02:29:22 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rightful office? He lost fairly. Quit crying and move on. If Kennedy was shot two years earlier how many would have died in Vietnam? The game goes both ways. Get a job.
Hey KooKoo. The 9/11 plan was set in action back when Clinton was in office. Not would have happened. Man, you showed your knowledge there.
2007-04-27 03:12:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
if you are a veteran like you say you are you should know the answer to that one The Democrat do nothing but get us in-trouble and then run!! As for Kookoo Bananas
you must not be a smart person if you think it only takes 6 month to cause 911!!!!!
2007-04-27 03:13:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
Gore did take his rightful office. He lost the election and its about time you got over it. He lost the count, the first recount, the second recount, ....... the umpteenth recount. He LOST. Got that?
2007-04-27 03:18:53 · answer #10 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋