English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Knowing that all men cheat, and since science proved men to be polygamous, is it time to reconsider monogamy? Could it be possible that Islam recognized man's polygamous nature and hence allowed them to have 4 wives?
Sorry for the bad phrasing, hope you got the message.

2007-04-26 20:21:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

5 answers

Men are not the only ones who are polygamous. Perhaps you do not realize that there are also polyandrous societies on the planet, where one woman has several husbands.If you don´t want to live a monogamous lifestyle, you should be able to find people who, like you, prefer a polygamous lifestyle. I would also like to add that it is not true that all men cheat. My father was the monogamous type. His second wife and his girlfriends all cheated on him, while he remained true to them although they did not deserve it. My question to you is if you are unselfish enough to let the women in your life be polyandrous(or polygamous!) too if they want.

2007-04-26 20:34:17 · answer #1 · answered by Happy Feet 3 · 1 0

this is exactly the reason Islam has allowed 4 marriages. But it it is not fun Islam has given permission only if a man can support his wives equally, physically, emotionally and monetery wise.
as far as women is concerned it is not there nature, well some do have polgamous nature but they are only 2 or 3%

2007-04-27 03:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by M & A 2 · 0 0

You are being clueless. Who to you think the men are cheating with? How could men cheat unless women did also and how would a man having many wives solve the problem since it would leave many men without wives.

2007-04-27 07:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by meg 7 · 2 0

The way I look at it is, biologically men are made to try and have as much sex as possible with as many women as possible. This is what has helped our species to survive and grow in large numbers.

The problem with this sort of reasoning (in my opinion) is that men are also programmed to defend their territory and their family at all costs.
Yet, I'm sure you would agree with me, that if you saw someone you didn't know standing on your lawn, it is hardly acceptable to attack him.
Or if someone put their hand on your girlfriend's arm, (while you may be tempted to) it is hardly acceptable to attack them either (in most cases anyways).

My point is, that like animals we have certain impulses.
The thing that seperates us from the animals is that we have the ability to control these impulses or at the very least, avoid acting upon them.

2007-04-27 03:42:40 · answer #4 · answered by Canucklehead 2 · 0 0

wat if they r ?
IT STIILL SHUDNT BE ALLOWED EVERYWHERE , IT WUD BE MORALY WRONG................
& ENEQUAL

2007-04-27 03:51:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers