Every fossil is a link between the past and present forms of an organism. The archetypal transitional fossil is the so-called missing link, the common ancestor between man and other apes.
2007-04-26 18:40:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Labsci 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is somewhat some lies in that query. Oh, i do no longer think of you're mendacity--i could be particularly shocked in case you probably did no longer even have self belief what you have written. yet in actual actuality which you have *been* lied to, or the people who confident you that evolution is inaccurate have been lied to themselves, or have been misled by somebody else who have been deceived, or however--yet someplace alongside the way, the training you got became fabricated by somebody. often, consumer-friendly creationists somewhat have self belief those issues; this is the great names accessible (Ken Ham, Duane Gish, and so forth.) who're actively and intentionally mendacity to the committed. there are various transitional fossils. Heard of Tiktaalik? specific, come to think of of it, you probable have--somebody's probable instructed you it is not likely a transitional fossil in any respect, the two because of the fact this is now opened a "hollow" on the two fringe of it or because of the fact it is not a chimera with the top of a fish and the physique of a lizard, or some thing like that. in actual actuality, technically, each and every creature is transitional, because of the fact there is no sharp difference between species--basically like, once you get suitable all the way down to it, there's no longer a sharp difference between what's a dialect of a language and what's its very own language. Spanish and Portuguese are often on a similar time intelligible yet are considered separate languages, at the same time as the various chinese language dialects (substantial ones, besides) are not on a similar time intelligible yet are all considered dialects of a similar language. As for the different objection, the "crockoduck" photograph of evolution exists purely interior the minds of people who don't be attentive to the way evolution works--or, as I say, interior the imaginations of people who desire to convince the flock that evolution is ridiculous and recommendations-blowing. you have heard of flying squirrels, have not you? they may be on their thank you to authentic winged flight (like bats) hundreds of thousands of years from now. the capacity to waft could make the version between looking a meal and starting to be a meal, a minimum of for some species. basically because of the fact your wings do no longer permit you fly like a poultry would not recommend they are ineffective.
2016-12-16 16:42:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by parenti 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil
2007-04-26 18:20:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mark S, JPAA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋