How can you be a "Christian" and still approve of the "death penalty?"?

Question

Wasn't the story of how "Christ" was executed on a "trumped-up charge" the epitomy of an "anti-death-penalty" lesson?!?

Answer 1

Christ's death was martyrdom. I mean, hey, if he's the Son of God, why didn't he stop his own execution?

But that's not the point, is it?

The death penalty was supposed to be some sort of deterrent so people would learn not to commit horrible crimes, and as we all know and see every day that it truly stops no one.

As I read entry after entry of "an eye for an eye", I must ask this - wasn't it Jesus who said to "turn the other cheek?"

Answer 2

True. The 'story' of how "Christ" etc...on a 'trumped-up charge'...etc...again. True...But: Based on Christian and God and the faith within that belies your 'trumped-up question'. As per what 'they' follow: Jesus was set up by his Father and did have a 'way out'. He chose to sacrifice himself. This was the break between the Old Testament and the New. The act was foretold and proof of pre-destiny. By which, if God is ultimate and can sacrifice his son in such a way, God himself has given his blessing on the death penalty.

Answer 3

Christians have approved of capital punishment for ages. Why is it suddenly barbaric? The death penalty wasn't designed to be abused (as it was with Christ). It's in place to rid society of the degenerate scum that have no intention of reform. Most large-crime convicts are in trouble with the law again if/when they are released. The death penalty avoids wasted tax dollars by not prolonging the imminent.

Answer 4

What an interesting point. Some people who answered your question seem not to know much about the death penalty system. Many people support the death penalty because of fears about killers being released into their communities and because they don't yet know about the issues surrounding the death penalty system.

Answer 5

We're all just a bunch of sinners,Christain or not. If somebody tortured or killed one of my loved ones (cats included) I would chop their arms off and cut out their tounges(maybe poke out their eyes) and then I wouldn't have to worry about the Death Penalty sentence this vile person would fight. Those killers get to live long after their victoms. I am a Christain and I know I am a sinner too. Only one Person who ever walked this Earth wasn't one. You know who I'm talking about. Jesus.

Answer 6

The preferrred court is quite screwed up whilst it contains unfastened exercising in many situations because of a case widely used as Employment branch v. Smith. examine Scalia's opinion and O'Connor's dissent. mutually as I in many situations like Scalia, he incredibly have been given it incorrect in this one. The court surely reported that unfastened exercising isn't a mandatory maximum suitable, which in useful words recommend that's not entitled to the Compelling activity attempt till it incredibly is blended with yet another mandatory maximum suitable (what's and is not a mandatory maximum suitable is finished as much as the court ideas you), say Freedom of association. The Compelling activity attempt is something the preferrred court made up because of fact, properly, who knows? It contains those 4 questions because it relates to unfastened exercising. bear in ideas for the reason that Smith, they court won't have the ability to apply this attempt till there is yet another mandatory maximum suitable in contact. a million) basically held religious theory? The Gov. might desire to tutor it is not. 2) Is there a burden on the religious theory The claimant might desire to tutor this. 3) Is there a compelling state activity? shown via the state. 4) much less restrictive ability of achieving the state objective? State might desire to tutor the regulation is incredibly the least restrictive recommend accessible. For the gov. to win, nonetheless it would not constantly artwork out this way, they might desire to tutor a million, 3 and four. Edit: I in simple terms want to sparkling one factor up. Our ancestors did not come right here for religious liberty, they got here for religious sanctuary. there's a huge distinction. in the process the 1600s and particularly a number of the 1700s each state had that's very own faith and different religions (meaning Christian denominations) weren't commonplace. the concept of religious liberty did not come into play till the Revolution.

Answer 7

are you saying all people given the death penalty are not guilty? That is foolish. Crimes committed here on earth have consequences. And the possibility of death is one of them. Some people are so base, mean, cruel, and disgusting they do not deserve to live. Serial killers, is one of them.

Answer 8

Beats me.. but I can say the diversion from Christ happens long before the injection.

Starts with the thing Jesus said - Your sons become your Judges - from. That is casting out demons in the name of the Adversary, God of the material ... or in other words, sounds like... we should have a Law with Physical Enforcement because -
Rule 1: ONLY the fear of retribution can persuade evil out of our midst.

Who knows what happened to Love one another as I have loved you... or be Ye therefore perfect as your Father in heaven is perfect.... heck, what about whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it.

It's bolstered by the ignorance of Jesus advice to "Give him your Coat' and 'Turn the other Cheek'... after all, we have a Law and see first rule.

Is coupled with the arrogance against 'Judge not lest ye be judged' which doesn't apply to 'evil', evil must be judged and it's in our hands to do that.... wheres the justice in Not repaying anyone evil for evil or Being careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody (Romans 12:17), being, in regard to evil, like infants... or just simply having faith like the Lord is faithful, and he will strengthen and protect you from the evil one?

And without a doubt 'It is done' in the end in disregard of those things you pointed out.

Answer 9

Was that a question?

Most people that are Christian and are in favor of the death pentalty "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth quote", which Jesus specifically taught should not be applied, and instead we should turn the other check.

Some Christians use Romans 13:1-4 to support their opinion.

These verses talk about how "higher powers" (aka governments) are "ordained of God" and the "ruler" (aka judge) is "the minister of God to thee for Good." but if you are evil be afraid of the ruler that "beareth not the sword in vain" meaning capital punishment.

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Romans 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Answer 10

WWJD? - Christ forgave his executioners. Wasn't "an eye for an eye" from the Old Testament?