his whole life has been about making messes and then letting someone else clean them up all this posturing is to keep the troops there at least until he is out of office so he can blame the next guy for his failures
2007-04-26 15:29:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6
·
8⤊
2⤋
We cannot set a timetable to Iraq at this time, as well as leave the Middle East. We must stay and win, or a destabilized Middle East will place many many countries into suffering from it. It doesn't matter if you have any interest in the Middle East or not, all the world will feel its affect.
Protecting the only greatest monies recognized in this world today is imperative. "Oil" is the only currency recognized today, and not even "gold" comes close to it's value. And the horrific effects it can cause. If these Jihadis and terrorist (who already know this) succeed in taking control of these refineries and wells, they will have the power over the world for which they continually seek.
The two most notable institutions in the world will have to deal with them, and call in on all their debts, and half of what the US has is from borrowed monies.
The International Monetary Foundation and The World Bank controls almost all the power we see in the world today. They can make you a super power, or make you a third world country. We say super power and will do what it takes to remain that way, to secure the better future for our children and their children's.
There is no other way!
2007-04-26 15:45:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
as a results of fact we've not any excellent to be in a usa that did not even threaten us! Iraq became into greater sturdy under Saddam Hussein! The racial, and non secular minorities have been actual greater secure under Saddam! i'm not attempting to declare he became right into a reliable guy in spite of the incontrovertible fact that this is actual.. the fact is after WW2 individuals concept they have been the however-est issues around and concept they had a excellent to invade any usa no remember what in the event that they do unlike them! and if actual all of us brings up 9/11 the info are that there have been no Iraqis in any of those planes and our "reasonable" Arab allies like Saudi Arabia and Egypt had lots of the human beings.. Al Quaida is a lot larger in Iraq now that we've invaded additionally ..
2016-12-10 12:34:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by kirk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pam, there are graves of thousands that sadam killed of his own people, he was a tyrant and a murderer. He supported terrorism, there was training facilities for terrorist in his country. Even if our reasons was not proved, because there was plenty of time to get those mass destruction weapons out of the counrty, we are liberating a counrty that will help to further secure the world. Thousands died to give us our freedoms. War is not pretty and it is sad. Those we fight only understand force. Those soldiers are hero's. You should read other sources on the accounts and successes besides the liberal media that puts every number in your face, but will not report the successes. If and when we come out, it can not be advertised. It would be like telling the terrorist when the coast will be clear and they could go in and masecure thos e poor Irac people who want democracy. This is a new kind of war that has never been fought before. Fighing a faceless, murdering, terrorist who hide only to strick again. Please stop letting the TV and the power seeking LIBS control your thoughts and emotions, base your belief on facts...
2007-04-26 15:39:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Listen, BOO HOO. Its not about the people that have died or are going to die. Its the principal of the matter...WE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Americans were completely mislead and lied to about the realty of the invasion. We were given false news when GWB jumped on the USS Abe. Lincoln and announced to the world MISSION ACCOPMLISHED.
He's done nothing from day one but make mistakes, if he were a CEO the share holders would have him fired on the spot. This man is ridiculous and the only reason he's still in office is because the Republican party doesn't want to admit to making mistakes. Pure and simple.
2007-04-26 15:31:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Israel is the puppet master that is pulling the strings in the Middle East wars. Since Bush is an Israeli agent, he is merely doing what he is told by his Zionist masters.
Israel rules America, not the American people. Sadly, this war will never end. If we started to withdraw our troops, Israel would rig a terrorist attack in America and frame the Muslims for it, just like they did on 9-11.
We are all slaves to the Zionist Israeli murderers.
2007-04-26 15:32:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
He will pull them out of Iraq when the Iran War starts.
2007-04-26 15:34:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No he has stated that the war wont end during his time of failure. I Am an American citizen but i can call him my president nor is he my leader. He would definatly have different feelings if his kids had to go fight and his thoughts would be AWOL.
2007-04-26 15:37:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bud W 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is a cocky man from the south, and bears no relevance to anyone unless its cash in his pockets. The only way he will submit to retreive, is when he knows for sure that Obama is going to take the reins in the primary, and at that point he needs to shift his tune to "I can get along with everybody." As he knows, that if he doesn't, he will not have any play when he leaves office. His butt will get in gear pretty quick. In the meantime, he doesn't care if our men and women are dead in Iraq, he only cares about his investments. We voted once again for a losing situation, and we are suffering worse than ever for it.
2007-04-26 15:31:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush wont be the one to start pulling the troops out......it will be the next president
2007-04-26 15:29:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by j _j_83221 4
·
8⤊
0⤋
Bush will be forced to stop the war because the Congress already passed the law for implementation of the withdrawal of troops in Iraq.
2007-04-26 15:30:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
3⤊
4⤋