Most people do not want smoking and it can be deduced from the number of votes.
2007-04-26 14:28:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
a possibility. In 1968, the supporters of Sen. Eugene McCarthy (aka the new child's marketing campaign) and Sen. Robert Kennedy have been so discouraged whilst Sen. Hubert Humphrey ultimately have been given the Democratic nomination on the convention, that they does not paintings contained in the marketing campaign for the time of the commonplace election and stayed faraway from the polls. The turnout replaced into very low between all the backers of the two McCarthy, who had gotten a form of votes in primaries, and Kennedy, who were killed, preferable to a devastating loss for Humphrey against Richard Nixon. The anger on the Democratic occasion fueled the riots in Chicago outdoors the Democratic convention. Following that conventional season, the delegate determination regulations have been revised. the present regulations are in line with those that have been first progressed following the controversies that exceeded off for the duration of that conventional season.
2016-10-03 23:26:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by vyky 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have mixed feelings about the bans. I am not a smoker, nor have I ever been. That being said, if someone wishes to smoke, I feel it should be his choice (within reason).
Therein lies the problem. Many smokers are their own worst enemies. I'm pretty laid back about people smoking around me, but invariably there's the one clown who just can't grasp that it's impolite to smoke one right after the other in an enclosed place and blow the smoke my way.
2007-04-26 14:28:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rick N 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why not ..... there is no harm from a smoking ban. Not smoking does not damage other peoples health.
2007-04-26 14:27:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
because less and less people actually smoke and the ones who don't like me don't want to taste smoke at their meal or where ever... if you want to smoke that bad step outside and let us who don't not have to smell or breath it in
2007-04-26 14:28:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because people do not want to breath second hand smoke?
2007-04-26 14:27:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by beren 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have no idea. But if they do not want smoking,band tobacco products.But no,they want the taxes from it but do not dare use it.It offend others. We will be happy to sell it to you but don't open the pack. Geesh!
2007-04-26 14:37:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I suppose that ratio to smokers and non smokers is slowly swinging in favor of the non-smokers. If they are a majority, then they will win the vote.,
2007-04-26 14:28:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by kimison_au 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
because the majority believes they dont want second hand smoke in their lives.
2007-04-26 14:32:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Smoking is old-fashioned. People like modern ways to destroy their lives these days.
2007-04-26 14:27:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
2⤊
1⤋