gay marriage+brother/sisters marriage? was the question? no need to be idiots..both are immoral eitherway!?

Question

my question was if the government were to allow it why shouldn't it be allowed to a brother and sister who grew up together and were eachothers first sexual experience(virginity) and were truly in-love, as a gay couple who met on a mountain hearding sheep or at a gaybar etc... no need to talk about having children, because gays don't have children simply because genetically it is imposible!!! infact being gay is more unnatural then 2 siblings because at some level nature allows siblings to reproduce, can't say the same for 2 men/woman!!!! so forget the genetic ramifications because gays can't even begin to reproduce! i was speaking politically if gays could or should be allowed to marry... should incestuous marriages between a brother/sister, mother/son , or daughter/father etc... be acceptable and allowed aswell??? that was the nature of my question!!!

Answer 1

Wonderful thing about morality... Everyone's got their own! I'll worry about mine, and you worry about your own.

Answer 2

First, I just want to clear the air by saying I'm gay, not infertile. I can still have kids, maybe not with my partner but oh well. It's akin to dating a woman with no ovaries, you just get someone else to incubate for you. Like renting a uterus for 9 months. It's easier than you think. So yeah, I'm gay and in a committed relationship and I still fully intend to have biological kids. Kids are great.

Anyways, the problem with the brother/sister is their relationship dynamics. Somehow it's frowned upon if they grew up together. Though they can marry if they were introduced later on in life as I recall. I know stepbrothers and sisters can, so I don't see why it'd be different for biological siblings.

I think the problem is that like with a mother/son, the mother plays a power role, she's had full control of her son, so she can brainwash him, which doesn't really make it his decision. I think there's also a close dynamic for siblings that grew up together.

So I guess in the end, I cannot pass judgment on families that wish to marry inside the family. It has happened before, as I recall there was a family in Europe that only interbred for generations, but it led to their demise in the end.

If they are adults, fully know the consequences, and can fully consent without any form of coercion, then I suppose they should be allowed to marry regardless.

That is my fair and impartial judgment.

Answer 3

I don't feel that if gay people were allowed to be married, my marriage and the marriages of other straight people will be less meaningful. In fact, I know without a doubt that it would not make mine less meaningful. It simply just would not affect us. I don't know whether people are born gay or not, I think it may be a bit of both. But I believe that you can't help who you love, and that gays should be allowed to marry. They deserve to love, too. Edit: I didn't know you meant this as a satire until after I submitted the answer. Well, now you know how I feel on the subject. lol. I was getting ready to call you a bigotted @ss.

Answer 4

Along with screwing up the DNA, brothers and sisters are sort of programmed to NOT fall head over heels in love with eachother. Maybe just friendly affection.

Gay marriage should be allowed. But incestual? Nope. Both aren't religiously acceptable, but I can see where the gay argument comes from.

Answer 5

You should have clarified it before.

But i still think its disgusting.

But here is the thing... If gay brothers and gay sister could get married... and the heterosexual incest counterparts could not... It would still be unconstitutional and discriminating. Both of those activities are distasteful and shouldn't happen at all.

I'm really displeased that you would what to include this in a same sex marrage.

Answer 6

Most, if not all states, have in their statute that marriage cannot be between most blood relatives.

Contrary to what you believe, we CAN reproduce. I was not castrated when I came out. Many gays and lesbians choose NOT to have children.

And why is same sex marriage immoral??

Answer 7

You know what, as long as the people involved are over 18 and human, and it's consensual, I don't give a rat's a** what goes on behind closed doors. It's THEIR BUSINESS. I'm not going to poke my head in.

If they want to get married, fine. It won't have any impact on my life, unless I want to marry a woman. There, I've made my opinion.

Answer 8

There is nothing immoral about a same-sex marriage.

Period.



Incest is wrong because of the possibility of genetic defects inherent in inbreeding situations.

Strawman argument.

Answer 9

prove that being gay is immoral without using a religious argument and maby someone will agree with you one day.

our law says that all of us are created equally and have the same rights. some of us have the right to get married therefore all of us do. no one contends that incest should be legal... except you maby. you are right, there no chance of creating a deformed baby through homosexual incest but the law is that incest is illegal therefore it is illegal for everyone.

Answer 10

isnt it good that gays cant reproduce...look at china trying to stop people from having kids!! i mean with all the breeding you people do, i'm sure humanity will wipe itself out pretty soon, so there will be no one to write or answer a stupid questions like this!!!

Answer 11

Because incest is more likely to create emotional problems, genetic defecines in childern and its looked down upon.

Gay marriage how ever has no problem its non of your buiessness who sticks there tounge or penis where.