2007-04-26 14:00:35 · 28 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes....Dems are weak. We were lucky Bush was in office during 9/11 otherwise a lot more would have happened
2007-04-26 14:04:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Did you mean to say that the other way around, Chi?
I'm sure the "worst" Republican candidate is NOT a better choice than the "best" Democrat candidate, since ANYONE can be a candidate at this point in the running.
Even with the better known candidates. I'd say Obama is a strong choice, and beats out some weaker Republican options.
On the flip side, it's hard to imagine that the Republicans "worst" candidate isn't a better choice than Hillary.
2007-04-26 15:46:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, normally (in the past) the worst Republican candidate is better than the best RAT candidate.
However, since Ronald Reagan, the Republicans have gotten more and more like the RATs.
They waste tax dollars like the RATs, and they show no spine at all in fighting the radical socialism that the Democrats push.
So now, there is no "best candidate" as the Republicans are as pathetic as the RATs.
We need a 2nd American Revolution--we do not need to vote anymore, as both parties are socialists and put other nations' interests ahead of our own national interest.
2007-04-26 14:07:58 · answer #3 · answered by RealTruth 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is really a question of how stupid Republicans can be. I'm a Democrat, and I wouldn't dare say the worst Democratic candidate is better than the best Republican candidate. For those of you that answered 'yes' to this question, YOU ARE MORONS !!
2007-04-26 20:23:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will there be true Republican Candidates this time around?
Would it surprise you to learn that Bush's Republican Administration has pitched and sold the OLD Southern Conservative Democratic Political View?
Why do you think so many BLUE Southerns were willing to vote Red? Bush's Southern Democratic wedge in the party widen the dissension already in the party with the growing Liberal perspective causing the Democratic Conservatives to jump ship and vote Republican.
I'm a Split Party Ticket Voter so my intent is Not to bash. I'd just like us all to look a little closer before we make our next Big Decision.
Old Southern Conservative Democratic stood for:
Cheap labor (import it, under educate, keep the poor poor)
Low-tax tradition of Southern Farmers, Ranchers & Oil Men
Fundamentalist Beliefs intertwined w/Govt
Militarism
Sound Familiar?
Wouldn't you as a Republican like to have your party back?
2007-04-26 14:11:57 · answer #5 · answered by ... 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, it's the other way around: the worst Dem candidate would be better than the best Repub candidate.
2007-04-26 14:28:42 · answer #6 · answered by catrionn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say yes. Over the past 30 years, the only strong Dem candidate was Bill Clinton. The rest of them have been political weaklings afraid to pull the cheap shots that the Republicans are so good at.
2007-04-26 14:07:52 · answer #7 · answered by beren 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I cannot picture this even happening at a time in our nation when the parties are so polarized.
But before I vote for a Liberal Republican, I will vote for a blue-dog Dem.
I just think that if a Liberal is going to be in the whitehouse, it should be a Democrat.
2007-04-26 14:30:54 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Decide for yourself, with the link below, for the field of candidates, and where they stand on the issues.
I can't say I like any of them. I like some of their positions, on some issues; but, a single position will not seal my vote in this crowd. I also detest where some of them stand on some issues. I would not change the Constitution, so some of these guys are automatically off of my list, while those who stayed are disqualified for other issues which are equally abhorrent to me.
2007-04-26 14:04:55 · answer #9 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you REALLY want me to answer that?
Let's see...
Bush has so far destroyed:
Our trust in our own government
Our credibility abroad
Our faith in discharging government power effectively without the need for all this Gestapo secrecy BS...
Our need for a CIC to have both feet (and mind) planted firmly in reality.
A President who LISTENS to the will of the people and is mindful of his own limitations as Commander-in-Chief.
And tries to be a POSITIVE influence in foreign relations, rather than IMPOSING his own negative ambitions on the world.
2007-04-27 10:21:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They're all pretty bad; even Giuliani partnered with a skunk to set up an exploitation business in Iraq.
I liked Wesley Clark. I wish he'd run, because I think he'd make a terrific president.
2007-04-26 14:23:58 · answer #11 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋