2007-04-26 13:27:56 · 19 answers · asked by hcogirl14 4 in Sports ➔ Baseball
It reminds me of a classic work of drama ... "Much Ado About Nothing."
2007-04-26 13:52:38 · answer #1 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
that's interior the baseball corridor of repute. right this is an excerpt from a piece of writing with regards to it. COOPERSTOWN, N.Y. - The corridor of repute now has the marvelous pink sock to commemorate Boston’s first international sequence call in 86 years. Curt Schilling donated the bloody sock he wore in the process game 2 of the international sequence to the corridor of repute on Thursday. The sock is a factor of a pink Sox exhibition celebrating the gang’s 4-game sweep of the St. Louis Cardinals.
2016-10-30 09:40:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? I thought the whole "bloody sock" thing was a great baseball story. Even if it wasn't entirely true, it was a great story. Why does Thorne feel the need to try to take that away from baseball fans? As far as I am concerned, the way it played out ( or appeared to play out) in 2004 is the version I am going to believe, because I want to believe it that way. It's the way I'm going to tell my kids it happened, regardless of what this reporter wants to have people believe.
2007-04-26 13:47:19 · answer #3 · answered by Ron Obvious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm just surprised it's an issue. It's a neat story that Red Sox fans can spread on to future fans. Adds more drama to that dream season the Sox had. Kinda like Babe Ruth calling his shot. You'll find experts arguing that Babe Ruth was really pointing at something else and never really called his shot, but it's a great story to tell to kids. The only thing that can come out of proving it wasn't blood is that you destroy a great story. Proving it to not be blood doesn't take away the champsionship, it's rather meaningless unless it means something to you.
2007-04-26 13:51:45 · answer #4 · answered by Dethklok 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get a DNA test on the sock. If it is blood then the DNA test will show it is so, if it is paint then obviously it would expose a scam. Either way one of them ends up looking like a jackass, makes for good story telling. Let the testing begin! Not judging one way or the other (really dont care either way) but obviously he was hurting and toughed out a great pitching performance.....you know his teammates respected the effort and his fans...and/or red Sox fans did also!
2007-04-26 13:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by viphockey4 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok im just gonna copy/paste my answer from another question just to get the 2 points =)
it was definitely real he wouldve had the common sense to perhaps CHANGE the sock before the game started if his ankle started bleeding he wouldnt be dumb enough to look like hes been bleeding for a half hour when he goes onto the mound
besides that announcer for the os has a dildo up his a** hes just sore the os lost to the sox and he wants to draw attention
on top of that who the hell cares? he won the damn game isnt that good enough? whats the retard trying to accomplish, a replay of game 6?
2007-04-26 13:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by Jay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once it's proven that it's real blood, Schilling should sue Thorne' ***.
Thorne's a Flunking......passive aggressive as..........
2007-04-28 04:42:00 · answer #7 · answered by eventhorizon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think people just have to have something to talk about... Annnd if it wasn't real blood? That changes history, how? It certainly doesn't change the score of those games. Pointless debate.
2007-04-27 10:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thorne misspoke cuz he misunderstood Mirabelli. It was all cleared up yesterday. It was blood.
2007-04-27 04:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by Jim G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not important anymore, but if you must know the truth . There was paint on a sock. And blood on the other. GO TRIBE !!!
2007-04-26 13:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋