these idiots.
Former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore on Thursday entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination with an Internet-driven announcement he said allows him to talk directly to voters.
If you want to talk to voters than go out and meet them, not hide behind your comp.
Furthermore, they got Goolianai Mc flashback Cain, and last but not least Romney who.
08 is gonna be great for dems again just like the take over of the house and senate.
2007-04-26
12:15:29
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
lol at the blank guy. Republican was spelled incorrectly on purpose. Repube lican. Thanks for bringing up the fact that I can not spell. Btw it is an ask column not a discuss forum and none of you thick headed repubes even answered the question. You just said look at the competition instead of how you dorks can actually win in 08.
2007-04-26
12:32:06 ·
update #1
lol nettel. John Mcain. Tell me you are joking. Doesn't he have alzeheimers, he always looks lost like he is tripping on some peyote or something.
2007-04-26
12:39:13 ·
update #2
No threatening candidates? Unfortunately dems have 3 edwards clinton and obama (whats his last name). Once they are done smearing each other one will have their chance to show up the however is left out of the 3 weak repubelican candidates
2007-04-26
12:49:30 ·
update #3
suppose to be how ever above.
2007-04-26
12:50:02 ·
update #4
wait no it is not nevermind. gonna go home from work now. later losers.
2007-04-26
12:50:34 ·
update #5
They won't win with any of the candidates they have now.
2007-04-26 12:19:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pop D 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Jim who? just because his state made news, he is trying to capitalize. He'll loose. Dem. John Edwards the richest candidate between both parties can't connect to the people that the Democrats work for (The Poor, not the middle class). The Hillary "Bill" Clinton. I don't think we are ready for a woman. And then there is Barrack "Osama" Obama. He truly doesn't have the experience working in Foreign affairs. The President deals more with Foreign issues than one would think. The State Governors are to deal with state issues. Having said that. It's sad to that we have so many Senators running for president.
Democrats best bet is Bill Richardson from New Mexico. This guy is great. (FYI that's coming from a Republican). He truly makes sense. Probably more sense than some of the Republicans. The problem he's not known becasue he doesn't have the money. He is sickly more suited for the job the Barrack and Hillary. I've been following this guy for about 8 years. I would actually consider voting for him over a republican.
John McCain will win. Because Honestly both parties do like him. Like Richardson he has an extremely large amount of Foreign experience. Which will help build our Allies and restore how America is looked at. Both McCain and Richardson have friends in high places in foreign countries. Foreigners like these 2 guy's. Either one would restore our Image. and these are the only 2 candidates out of all of them that can do it, and still remain strong on foreign issues.
2007-04-26 12:36:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is an interesting criticism, since we are using it as a discussion forum and I have seen a lot of criticism on these boards about the multi-million dollar media campaigns that should be discussed in an open forum on the free Internet! Are you just trying to make up things to criticize now? And by the way, at least the republican idiots can spell republican, heck, they can even spell democrat and independent.
2007-04-26 12:25:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jim 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
They WILL win by limiting their seditious behavior to lower than the liberals in the democrat party. We'll lose as the nation grows tired of self-punishment and name-calling, spreading rumors and treating our representatives as "guilty until proven innocent". We're doing it to ourselves. We got a mandate to balance against President Bush, because people were scared. It's going to backfire if we don't have the backbone to support the patriotic and non-seditious leaders in the democratic party.
I'm a democrat. This question is a seditious post. Study it carefully for the need of the poster to insult our representatives (in either party), and how aggressively they attack anyone who disagrees with them. When you spread unfounded rumors, treat our representatives as guilty until proven innocent, call them names, and otherwise undermine those who represent our country, you have acted seditious.
Oh, we hear the refrain: "I have free speech! How dare you try to silence me!"
Don't stop. We support your free speech. You just have no right to expect people NOT to answer you. They have free speech as well, even republicans (tip of hat to opposing side, but all fellow Americans, I hope).
This post could have been made (and been patriotic dissent) without the sedition.
They can't do it. They NEED to try to undermine our country if they don't get their way. If they be captain, they'll sink the boat. If they can't win, they'll throw the game board in the air. If they can't get their President into office, they'll complain about the electoral college EVEN THOUGH they had NO problem with it until they lost.
It's wrong. People see it. People like this will cost my party a lot if we DON'T STAND UP AGAINST THE SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR OF OUR PEERS!
There are an amazing number of patriotic democrats and patriotic former democrats out there. TAKE THE PARTY BACK FROM THE SOCIALISTS AND SEDITIOUS!
2007-04-28 15:05:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why don't you ask the question without making derogatory comments about either party?
If you want to show why you support Democrats, then show it.
Why don't you run for office if you could do better. If you showed that you could do a good job, people would vote for you.
Talk about solutions instead of throwing insults around like confetti.
This is not the way to show class.
2007-04-26 12:24:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cold Hard Fact 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Fred Thompson (rep) has media support, and he's rising in the polls without even announcing that he's running.
Another Reagan with a Tennessee accent...
2007-04-26 12:19:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because the Dems that out number them will not come out to exercise their right to vote.
2007-04-26 12:37:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kenny J 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Look at the opposition.
40 % of Americans will not vote for Hillary in any circumstance.
Obama is appearance over substance.
Edwards is in the pocket of Soros.
Gore is a joke. He couldn't even win against Bush.
The Republicans have nothing to worry about. The American public isn't stupid and learn from their mistakes. Thanks to Pelosi and Reed it won't be a hard choice for intelligent people.
2007-04-26 12:19:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by blissdds 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Because half of the US registered voters are Republican.
2007-04-26 12:24:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Suzy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually quite easy......look to your left....the Dems have no threatening candidates yet.
2007-04-26 12:39:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋