For example, in medicine all the advances, do not really increase the length of life (ancient bible passages give 70 yrs, as the length of life), or the enjoyment of life (we are overloaded with worries, even about the air we breathe and the food we eat----poisoned with industrial minerals), or in cosmology the advances in knowledge simply dumbound anyone who tries to keep up, with absolutely "neutral" facts that do not make you happy the least bit. The "billions of years" simply stun a human being, rather than enlighten.
2007-04-26 11:45:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I wasn't alive when polio and small pox was running rampent --- I am thankful that I never had to worry about that!!!
I believe that the individual person or culture handle science in differnt ways. I for one, purchase what is good for my life. I don't find phones (cell, or land) healthy for me, so I don't buy 'em. I do buy internet access, and find this joyful and healthy for me. I have buddies who flood themselves with technology --- go financially broke on the junk --- and stress themselves out with their uses. Just thinking about them and their life style they've bought for themselves; well, I stress out.
2007-04-26 11:55:25 · answer #1 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
- in Europe due to bad sanitary conditions in the citiens life period was half of that
- enjoyment of life - not having anything to eat or work all day in the fields?
- cosmology - how can anyone think like that?
2007-04-26 19:09:37 · answer #2 · answered by elcabong 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the good comes bad so both.
2007-04-26 18:52:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! It gets better and it gets worse.
2007-04-26 18:53:06 · answer #4 · answered by Doctor J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋