Exact quote, Ny Post and Yahoo guest editorial, pre liberal whine, remember this is a traditionally democratic paper.
And there's the real problem: From the start, Reid and the Democrats have seen the war in Iraq as a partisan opportunity.
They refuse to present a unified front to the rest of the world - especially to America's enemies - because, in their pinched view, to do so would be to weaken their own prospects for retaking the White House in 2008.
No, Reid didn't repeat his declaration of defeat during yesterday's speech from the Senate floor.
It probably has dawned on him just how big a political blunder he committed - witness Sen. Chuck Schumer's gentle contradiction of the majority leader over the weekend, insisting that "the war is not lost."
Then again, Reid didn't have to repeat his original remarks - because the imposed timetable he announced, if enacted, would bring about precisely the same result. Their blood stands to be on his hands. (RIGHT AGAIN!
2007-04-26 11:09:29 · 8 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
jeremy, i think you missed the point. this editorial correctly calls reids comments nonsensical and even schumer contradicts him. rarely do i agree with a liberal on anything but this is absolutely priceless. im sorry but the man has no clue whatsoever and has no busienss in any legislative body in any capacity.
2007-04-26 11:16:30 · update #1
i swear these liberals are positively priceless...his invasion, his occupation...LMFAO...so the pre flip flop, John Edwards vote and the Billary vote meant nothing, huh....I guess Harry R. isnt the only joke around here. oh well.
2007-04-26 14:18:29 · update #2
As of Reid's surrender to the enemy, ALL loss of life will be blood on Democrats hands.
Democrats are responsible for all future deaths.
You can't just surrender, and then go play games.
2007-04-26 11:16:32 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why did Nancy Pelosi wreck her notice that this congress stands out as the main clean and ethical congress ever? Now, the large question - who wrote her wellness care invoice? i'm confident there have been a number of gamers invoved - NARAL, the Unions, Tides, center for American progression... Who will the invoice earnings maximum? The unions, NARAL, and so on...
2016-10-03 23:09:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If objecting to a war started by a lying President based on falsified evidence that has cost the lives of over 3000 Amrican soldiers is being 'partisan" then we need more partisans.
2007-04-26 11:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think you are thinking of the NY Times...the NY Post is the equivalent of the National Enquirer and is owned by Rupert Murdoch (Fox News). I don't whether the war is lost, but it definitely ain't going well.
2007-04-26 11:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yep...count me among the partisans. The folks who initiated this insane war have the blood on their hands...end of story dude, but keep trying to place the blame elsewhere.
2007-04-26 11:18:08 · answer #5 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes I would say that I do agree with Mr. Schumer on this.
2007-04-26 11:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't matter if he says it once, twice or 100 times, Bush has lost the war in Iraq,, his invasion was a fiasco, his occupation is total chaos in the midst of the Iraqi Civil War.
2007-04-26 11:37:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
never agree with liberal's
2007-04-26 11:14:13 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋