Do astrophysicists believe that the sun formed from the recombination of material from a very massive first generation star that may have exploded or from a combination of remnant material from maybe more than one very massive first generation star that amalgamated within a spiral arm of our galaxy? Since bing bang theory can only account for elements up to Li-7, the fact our planet has natural elements up to the atomic number of 92 shows that they could only have been fusion products cooked inside of an earlier star. If the universe is almost 14 billions years old and our sun is 4.6 billion years old, these ancient stars had to burn out very, very quickly to have been able to reasseble into our sun. Does the time required even rule this out and that maybe the material was helped along to formation by another blast wave or interaction with some large object like another star?
2007-04-26
09:46:50
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space