Why isn't the media making it a big deal of this. The parents and University should be run threw the ringer and charged with child endangerment!!!
2007-04-26 09:04:03 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Actually I've seen this on several channels. But I'd like to know why a four year child was on the sideline?! Anyone who knows even a little bit about football knows this is a dangerous area and many photographers have been hit on the sidelines before. The player is not at fault as it was almost impossible for him to stop at the speed he was going and by the time he saw the child. I think this shows poor judgement on the father's part.
2007-04-26 09:11:12 · answer #1 · answered by 2craz4u 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I heard the liberals saying that it was George Bush's fault and that Carl Rove and Dick Cheney should resign.
This was a conspiracy plotted by the Republicans to get the focus off of the war. It is sickening to see the lengths these republicans will go to to silence their critics.
Obviously this 4 year old boy was an outspoken critic of Bush's policies on the re-distribution of candy and the censoring of Elmo. Bush arranged the whole thing to take this kid out, but something went wrong. This tough little tyke survived and now the whole world is going to know about it.
2007-04-26 16:11:30 · answer #2 · answered by songndance1999 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was an accident. Yeah, the parents shouldn't have had him behind the end zone, but you cannot blame the school, team or player for the accident. The kid is fine - move on.
2007-04-26 16:08:43 · answer #3 · answered by biscuitperifrank 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not the university, the parents. (they'll prolly file suit against the A.D.) I saw the video and didn't notice the child's parents in the shot.
2007-04-26 16:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
â The parents let the kid stand there
â The school allowed many kids to stand there
â It was an accident waiting to happen
â The kids was fine
I'm thinking
â No lawsuit
â Change is policy of who can stand where
2007-04-26 16:31:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Right on! Charges should be filed. Oh I forgot its football, no harm. NOT!
2007-04-26 20:13:44 · answer #6 · answered by kolorz 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
THE CHILD'S FATHER SHOULD HAVE BEEN RIGHT NEXT TO HIM - I UNDERSTAND WHY THE BOY WAS THERE - BUT HE WAS UNPROTECTED.FOOTBALL IS WILD AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT. THE POOR GUY WHO HIT THE KID MUST FEEL AWFUL I FEEL BAD FOR HIM.........
2007-04-26 16:56:16 · answer #7 · answered by NATIVE NEW YORKER 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why was the kid on the sideline in the first place
2007-04-26 16:07:25 · answer #8 · answered by gimmieswag 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ah! i havent heard about that.
that is soooo sad! (tear)
2007-04-26 16:08:55 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont kno but is the kid hurt or anything
2007-04-26 16:07:05 · answer #10 · answered by me &hearts(who else) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋