Harry Reid said we lost the war. Well, then, who won?

Question

Steve you know that was only one mission.

Answer 1

Harry Reid who? Apparently he isn't paying attention. The war on terror is still progressing. It won't be over until terrorists, decide it's time to stop murdering innocent, free-thinking people. I can't live with terrorists, so all of them, or we must die, it seems. Or, terrorists can stop being terrorists. America, and other countries, who are helping in the war on terrorism, sacrifice everything they've got, to keep the world free, and safe. What are other countries doing to destroy these murdering, uncaring, terrorizing maniac's? That is the real question!

Answer 2

Until the Press & the Liberals stop considering the US a BULLY & imperialistic it is unlikely we will ever be allowed to win. Granted we don't declare war we declare a police action. Police actions just mean the best one can do are having a stalemate.

A small group of insurgents/outside agitators with the press & liberal's help can create havoc for the world's population. They will then spin it to be caused by the US.

The press won. They got all the ratings & were able to sell more advertising time at a higher rate. Even though the press says they are against the arms industry, it could be argued that they are their best salesmen.

Answer 3

The conflict on Terrorism did not have squat to do with the conflict against Saddam. the respond on your question is that Alkaeda gained as quickly as we went into Iraq on account that gave them time to get out of Afghanistan and reorganize into the Iraq $h!t hurricane the Neocons made. Iran gained because of fact Barney and organisation did not have the brains to work out that a unfastened election in Iraq might produce a Shiite Iraq unifying with a Shiite Iran that's the only different Shiite united states of america interior the international. The terrorists gained because of fact that's the sight of all this terror that's their objective. The greater countries we declare conflict on and the greater conflict we proceed to salary the greater helpful of their ideas and dam it that's working. Bush keeps going for it like a moth into the hearth . We had lost this conflict so undesirable via 2 years in there grew to become into not something left to lose different than the physique count quantity and timber recognition. Telling the Dems they might desire to locate a answer to win timber Iraq attack is like taking a burned out twisted break of a head on collision prepare break to the close by motor vehicle physique shop.

Answer 4

I thought we did when Mission Accomplished was declared. After which we did loose the war or occupation, and we are loosing everyday.
Please think beyond Repugnant sound bites and tell me this, what kind of uniform do the shites wear or the sunnis? Amounts everyone there who are the only ones the most identifiable? And why do you insist on killing more and more of our troops for a political sound bite.
You want our troops to win and you want to use only military options then declare reenactment of all major operations this way our troops can kill people and not wait for them to kill them first before they can respond.

Answer 5

Up until this year I had some respect for Harr Reid. No one has won yet, we will if we stay. No WAR IS UNWINNABLE. Providing you have the will to win it.

Answer 6

Let's make it be Harry Reid loses. He needs to resign immediately.

Answer 7

The Democrats aka the Insurgency

Answer 8

Terrorism, al qaeda, radical Islam - the belief that America must die!

the poster Mission accomplished was created by our troops on the ships- if you pay attention to aspects you would know that- Bush did not create it nor did he ask to put it up- it was the troops that did so because they felt as though they had accomplished what they were ordered to do.

Answer 9

The insurgents in Iraq.

And when you say insurgents, it's hard to say it without everyone thinking you just said *f^ck* in Sunday School.

The "insurgents" (*gasp*) are just the Iraqi citizens who took up arms (weapons) when the Americans came in to "liberate" them. If a country (let's just say France since everyone hated them for a while) came to "liberate" us from (what Europe actually believes to be) the Great Dictator George, how many people do you know who would take up arms (weapons) to defend this country and try to make France go home?

France would call these people Insurgents.

Answer 10

Nobody won, and everybody lost. Americans lost over 3,000 soldiers and at least $1 trillion. Iraqis lost peace and are now struggling to survive.