They passed a bill for defeat they already said it when they send general Petraeus in Iraq then turned there backs on him and then the Millitary.
2007-04-26 07:22:01 · 11 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She also met with terrorist
2007-04-26 07:30:13 · update #1
Reid want give bush a clean bill oh and he said "The war is lost" that seems to be turning your back on the millitary
2007-04-26 07:31:27 · update #2
thats not true congress has the power to stop funding so get your facts right.
2007-04-26 07:32:43 · update #3
I don't care if they changed there name there still the same democrat party to me.
2007-04-26 07:34:02 · update #4
look at the restrictions they put on it they tiyed the millatary hands together.
2007-04-26 08:20:00 · update #5
I don't understand a damn word you just said.
Could you translate it into English, please?
2007-04-26 07:26:43 · answer #1 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Bush and Bush alone has the power to grant the funding at this point. If anyone is holding out it is him. The ball is in his court but, Bushie doesn't want to play. He wants to cry foul and not do anything. The political pissing contest needs to end in the White House. Bush is supposed to be our leader. He needs to step up, work on a compromise. He needs to set the example for one time in his political farce of a career.
2007-04-26 14:31:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is vetoing the funding for the troops...So I would say he's the one tying it up with politics...benchmarks are good enough for corporate missions, I wonder why the pro business Republicans have problems with them now!!
2007-04-26 14:41:13 · answer #3 · answered by gunkinthedrain 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush has the bill. It is his decision to fund the troops or not. By continuing funding and leaving open the time table Congress is doing the troops a favor not the opposite.
2007-04-26 14:27:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
not true, the real facts would behoove you..
Pelosi had a private conversation with Petraeus, and the bill increases funding for US troops..
2007-04-26 14:28:13 · answer #5 · answered by neddie 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No one is turning their backs on the military, and it's about time someone made a stand!
2007-04-26 14:28:31 · answer #6 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It seems to me like a good general picture of the Democratic party's overall strategy.
2007-04-26 14:27:33 · answer #7 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I don;t get it...try rewording the question to 'Is this YOUR democratIC party now? And then clarify your details. Sources also help. Good luck!
2007-04-26 14:27:45 · answer #8 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
There is no such thing as a democrat party. So the answer is No
2007-04-26 14:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
I keep reading your question over and over I still don't understand it?
I think Sadaam Lied has your homework
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070426110517AAW4uCw&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMhjNTUYlJXs9gIPJHfBP1jhytEGSf6EEb66gyjkF1yytoAlvdzHh4kQcSzHSiO17uaw--&paid=answered#QZJ7W2DuAzWAu8UXOItVcTAVadsz6VK4Ny5Z71hiadUNciCQLGpr
2007-04-26 14:27:11 · answer #10 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
THE DEMOCRATS ARE SOFT THEY SEEM TO BE MASOCHIST. THEY WANT BUSH STOMPING ALL THEIR BILLS INTO THE GROUND. THEY ARE PLAYING POLITICS WITH THE LIVES OF OUR SOLDIERS.
2007-04-26 14:27:34 · answer #11 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋