like both shows but I think Rome is a much better show; especially historically.
However Jonathan Rhys Meyers is an exceptional actor and very, very easy on the eyes and loins...
2007-04-26 06:51:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Rome was the balls, but now is over. I am so into Tudors right now. It's great. I am telling everyone at work to watch it.
2007-04-26 07:01:35 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HBO's Rome captures the essence of Rome at the time, even if all the events in it are not historically accurate. I'd rather have another season of Vorenus and Pullo (and see how Livia eventually becomes the murderous witch she was). But since that's not possible, I'm turning to The Tudors for my weekly time-travel fix. Sadly, it too plays fast and loose with the real events, which were quite exciting enough as they actually happened. Hey, but we still get to see the "most beautiful Prince in Christendom".
2007-04-28 00:23:30 · answer #2 · answered by Holly R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Tudors
2007-04-26 06:55:27 · answer #3 · answered by corazon 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are both great, but I love the Tudors more. It's a really good story line and Rhys-Meyers looks gorgeous.
2007-04-27 08:02:49 · answer #4 · answered by Hugo rocks 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rome for the action. Tudors for Johnathan Rys Meyers. =)
2007-04-26 06:55:25 · answer #5 · answered by Simone T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hbo's Rome
2007-04-26 06:53:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the Tudors better - just because personally I find that period of history more interesting.
2007-04-26 06:54:16 · answer #7 · answered by radiancia 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tudors- it's juicy and the acting is better, plus better sex
2007-04-26 07:00:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I LIKE ROME BETTER BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER CAUSE ITS OVER
2007-04-26 06:54:34 · answer #9 · answered by eyesinthedrk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋