You may recall this reporter, Ware, he's the one who recently mocked John McCain for suggesting the situation in Baghdad was getting better by walking through the streets. He said today that the dems' plan would be a disaster. So, as one of the Bush administration's biggest critics in the media, is he new a con shrill, or are dems and libs willing to admit that their "plan" will be a disaster and lead to far worse chaos in Iraq?
http://newsbusters.org/node/12321
2007-04-26 05:56:42 · 8 answers · asked by hkhkjh k 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he's just honest, the dems aren't. They care about politics, not what happens to Iraq, the region or even us. They're playing the polls, not security.
2007-04-26 06:00:19 · answer #1 · answered by Tired o 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's time for Iraq to grow up and take control of their own country. Our military and security is starting to suffer from this drawn-out disaster. No more blank checks for Bush!
2007-04-26 13:01:57 · answer #2 · answered by Gemini 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing worse than starting a war by using lies and manipulating intelligence information to suit their own purpose. By the way, the only "plan" offered by the Dems was directly taken from national security sources.
2007-04-26 13:10:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm sorry have you been living and reporting in Baghdad for 4 years and 3 months or have you been sitting in your chair pretending that you have a real life by posting chidish crap on the Internets?
2007-04-26 13:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Libs/Pelosi/Reid: Birds of a feather. Lie together
2007-04-26 13:11:02 · answer #5 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, it just means that unlike FOX, CNN is able to report things without a constant skew to one side over the other. for crying out loud fox reported that we found WMD's in iraq when we didn't, they also had to appoligize to congress for actions they did in reporting false news to the american public a couple years back.
2007-04-26 13:07:42 · answer #6 · answered by the 2nd woody 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He made an interesting turnaround, looks like someone 'persuaded' him to say things friendly of the Bush Administration.
2007-04-26 13:05:09 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's entitled to his opinion.
2007-04-26 13:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋