Sen. Joe Lieberman Says We're Fighting Al Queda In Iraq?

Question

"Indeed, to the extent that last week's bloodshed clarified anything, it is that the battle of Baghdad is increasingly a battle against al-Qaeda. Whether we like it or not, al-Qaeda views the Iraqi capital as a central front of its war against us."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502410.html


What happens when a level headed Democrat actually starts showing he cares about the Iraqi people?

"TheQueen": You just posted an article that contradicts everything you said. You just said that the primary cause of violence in Iraq today is sectarian then posted an article how Al Qaeda is growing in influence in Iraq...

Answer 1

"What happens when a level headed Democrat actually starts showing he cares about the Iraqi people?" His party calls him a traitor, runs a clown against him, and loses

Answer 2

He is a twit. If George and Company had NOT invaded Iraq, they would not be having the issues they are having now. Contrary to the hype, the MAJORITY of the destruction is NOT perpetrated by Al Qaeda but by Sunni on Shia and vice versa fighting. It is growing but it is this Presidents interference in a country that had nothing to do with the attack on us that drew a terrorist group there. Hussein was secular and despised by Bin Laden. We took him out and created a vaccuum which has been filled by sectarian violence and the now growing Al Qaeda.

Answer 3

When will Bush take responsibility for his decisions? The right tries to blame Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Air America, the democrats, the "liberal media", Rosie O'Donnell, everyone. They'll try to put the responsibility everywhere except where it belongs: the oval office. The scenario Lieberman describes did not exist in March of 2003 and is the direct result of the ineptitude of the Bush administration. Bush likes to call himself the decider. Well, his decisions have put us where we are now which is stuck in Iraq with nothing but bad options to choose from.

Answer 4

reality: The Afghani mujahedin - and the Taliban and al-Qaida- were effectively created through the CIA, that is Pakistani equivalent the ISI and Britian's MI6. In admitting this, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who develop into President Jimmy Carter's nationwide safe practices Adviser contained in the previous due 1970's, has disclosed Carter's secret directive to bankroll the mujahedin and us of a's collaboration with 'Saudis, the Egyptians, the British, the chinese (to initiate) providing guns to the mujahedin...... (Pilger, 364). "Freedom next Time." through John Pilger.

Answer 5

Great question! Love watching them scurry to cover their Liberal know-nothing tails.

I especially love, "they weren't there until we invited them..."

Yes, Libs, we "invited them." By taking out an evil genocidal maniac, we left Iraq open to the predatorial terrorists. How thoughtful are our Liberals who think we should have left Iraq subject to Saddam.

And you think we should leave them like that?

Answer 6

It stands to reason that if we remove our presence in Iraq, forces hostile to the U.S. will attempt to "take over" the Iraqi goverment.

Answer 7

Sorry Al Queda was not in Iraq until we invited them there by turning the country into a chaotic mid 13th century boarderless riot.

Thanks for your vapid question.

Answer 8

Yeah, he sure cares about those 655,000 Iraqis (and growing) who won't be able enjoy any freedom at all.

Answer 9

I wonder if Lieberman can talk while the AIPAC drinks a glass of water. (he's a puppet.)

Answer 10

A - L Q - A - E - D - A not al queda