a. the suspect was never at the crime scene
b. the suspect may have been at the crime scene,because DNA fingerprinting has a large error rate.
c. the blood sample to come from another person,but the suspect may still have been there.
d. the blood sample was probably degraded over time.
e. you cannont get DNA fingerprint from a blood sample.
2007-04-26 05:21:27 · 16 answers · asked by sheng b 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
c
2007-04-26 05:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by hcbiochem 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You CAN get a DNA fingerprint from a blood sample. It's just a code. If they don't match, then it was either from a different person or the very small chance of error.
2016-05-19 03:31:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will say c. the blood sample to come from another person,but the suspect may still have been there.
but there will be many people who'll say a. the suspect was never at the crime scene
both are correct theoritically,
the defence lawyers will use A while prosecution will use C
2007-04-26 05:25:57 · answer #3 · answered by SuNiL 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would guess they collected blood that was from one person and a DNA sample that was from another.
2007-04-26 05:25:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
E, you cannot get DNA from a fingerprint.
2007-04-26 05:25:15 · answer #5 · answered by oceanchick4043 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
C makes the most sense to me!
2007-04-26 05:27:14 · answer #6 · answered by BeC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definately C
2007-04-26 06:37:30 · answer #7 · answered by Sammi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
C seems most likely.
2007-04-26 05:24:34 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you did not give enough information to correctly answer this question
2007-04-26 05:52:15 · answer #9 · answered by RUSSELLL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
C is the only answer.
2007-04-26 05:26:31 · answer #10 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋