2007-04-26 04:07:40 · 3 answers · asked by mick rogers 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Nutcase
2007-04-26 04:25:32 · answer #1 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Icke isn't a prophet - fake or in any different case. he's a guy who salary from the stupidity of others. it is not going you're a Christian. in case you have self belief you have 'journey,' you're incorrect. there is no Illuminati, so Icke can not be any form of "insider." there is no such subject as a 'intense up freemason,' so Icke can not be a sort of. somewhat? you are going to apply BBC information? you are going to apply tooth as information of reptillian beings? So - to sum up - you are going to apply British tooth as information. Wow. it is even worse than utilising YouTube as a reference, or believing something that Icke says and repeating it! given which you weren't around interior the "day of Noah" it is not going that something you will desire to assert approximately that factor is in any respect appropriate. OMG, you truthfully DID use YouTube as a reference! lower back: Wow. Icke isn't a Freemason. His spouse - being a chick and all - can not be a Freemason. His youngster can not be a Freemason.
2016-12-16 16:05:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't think we need our leaders actually to be reptiles to account for their totalitarian ways. Power corrupts, and all that. There's more than enough evil in human nature to account for all of it.
Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
-- Robert Frost
2007-04-26 04:57:59 · answer #3 · answered by Philo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋