What significnace could there be of a painting which is 130cm by 200cms in size?

0 ⤊

What significnace could there be of a painting which is 130cm by 200cms in size?

2007-04-26 04:05:44 · 3 answers · asked by klt1986 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History

3 answers

Personally, I'd think that the event or person portrayed in the painting would be of more significance than its dimensions.

2007-04-26 04:43:37 · answer #1 · answered by Chrispy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋

It would depend on the subject I supose. But the proportion is one you can get from a pentagon. The proportions of the rectangle at the drawing are 1:1539 which is really very close to 130:200.

2007-04-26 13:23:29 · answer #2 · answered by dimitris k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Is that the proportions of the Golden Rectangle?

(I think in inches and feet, so I can't translate to meters...)

2007-04-26 11:08:51 · answer #3 · answered by aspicco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋