2007-04-26 02:20:51 · 9 answers · asked by Gypsy Gal 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
President is an individual person to speak on be half of the countries, make laws, need to supervise the politician who will be responsible to hold the law and not to break the law.
He or she must have a good image to be respected by the public.
2007-04-26 02:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by ko 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what is your alternative? If America had no President, who would be held ultimately responsible for domestic and international issues. Every country has an individual with the ultimate responsibility for his country. If you want a monarchy rather than a republic, Britain has tried that and it doesn't work.
2007-04-26 02:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's no wonder you asked that question in view of how the current Commander-in-Chief totally f*cked up the country.
Makes you wonder why one needs a President when all he does is mess up the country, bankrupt the reserves, give impassioned speeches others write for him and helped foreigners while leaving Americans in the lurch.
For goodness sake, get rid of this Republican President!
2007-04-26 02:23:46 · answer #3 · answered by Magma H 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Someone has to run the ship. Every corporation has one single leader. The USA is a major business and it has to have one person who has the final say in what happens with this business.
2007-04-26 02:25:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So people have someone to blame when things go wrong.
2007-04-26 02:42:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause Bush doesn't know his job.
2007-04-26 02:24:57 · answer #6 · answered by electra_lutteur 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Checks and balances... dont you rememer your high school government class?
2007-04-26 02:25:06 · answer #7 · answered by Ryan F 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
better then anarchy
2007-04-26 06:11:38 · answer #8 · answered by robert p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a what?
2007-04-26 02:28:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋