Personally, my choice would be the awful-looking frontosa cichlid, yikes!
2007-04-25 23:22:50 · 8 answers · asked by Laurenzo O 2 in Pets ➔ Fish
Tattooed fish - whatever the species: http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/pfk/pages/blog.php?blogid=32
If you want a single species my vote goes to the mola:
http://www.oceanlight.com/spotlight.php?img=03325
or Astronesthes: http://marcus.whitman.edu/~yancey/astronesthes1.jpg
2007-04-26 13:14:58 · answer #1 · answered by copperhead 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the blood parrot and its similar types are hideous, like the Frankensteins of fish.
Really all fish are ornamental, since that's why we keep them, so it we're going to differentiate I would think 'ornamental' would mean a fish created specifically for the aquarium, like fancy goldfish or the long finned betta - Frontosa aren't really ornamental, they're 100% natural.
2007-04-26 06:43:56 · answer #2 · answered by Ghapy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I gotta say the Toadfish are the most amazing and notably ugly freakin creature I've ever seen. This is an example of something being so freakishly ugly, i find it beautiful.
http://chemistry.csudh.edu/faculty/jim/cozfeb05small/toadfish.jpg
http://www.stephenwong.com/divetoto/albums/album25/Yellow_striped_Toadfish.sized.jpg
http://www.nicholasroussos.com/images/splendid-toadfish.jpg
http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=31044&rendTypeId=4
2007-04-26 07:24:25 · answer #3 · answered by Accellerated Catalyst 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If looking ugly dont call it ornamental.
2007-04-26 06:38:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the old saying goes "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"
2007-04-26 07:09:01 · answer #5 · answered by Mantra 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lou han looks ugly now.
2007-04-26 07:31:43 · answer #6 · answered by ticktag 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
otak-otak hahaha
2007-04-26 06:46:53 · answer #7 · answered by kurt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most catfish to me....
2007-04-26 09:58:35 · answer #8 · answered by sewingmom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋