both semi finals r quite boring..........are we going to get a good final....i dont think so.......australia is too best and dey will give thier best in finals
MOST BORING CRICKET WORLD CUP-2007
and it will be boring till there is australia......2015 world cup would be good.....cuz
Ponting will retire
Hayden will retire
Gilchrist will retire
Lee maybe
Symonds maybe
Hussey will retire
all these players are over 30
2007-04-25 20:18:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
The Kiwis are the best!!
2007-04-26 18:03:51 · answer #1 · answered by Riya 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, Impressive foresight !.....but till that time More Ponting , Hayden, Gilchrist , Symond would be produced..........Don't you know Australia is a factory for producing the best players !! they won't lose their grip on cricket !
And about South Afirca and NewZealand...........both my favourite teams have disappointed me so badly !!though i was sure that the final would be played between Australia and Srilanka...but i was expecting a better performance from both of these........and they played pathetic.........that was not the way to play semis........Comeon! they were playign as if they were in street !!they have truly presented the victory on plat to the opposite teams !
You are right, this was the most boring world cup i have ever watched......and strange too...so many ups and downs, Upsets, miseries and what not !
2007-04-25 22:17:21 · answer #2 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New Zealand without doubt. Simplest reason being that New Zealnd bowling has so much variety in them. They have a quality pacer in Bond and a world class spinner in Vettori. To their comparision, South Africa have extremely predictable attack, with 5 pacers who bowl exactly at the same pace!
Add to that, New Zealand had probably the best captain in the world Fleming.
Batting wise, New Zealand are equally good. Somehow their batting didnt click in this World Cup. But still, overall if you comapre, I think New Zealand werea complete side.
2007-04-25 21:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by Prasad 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering the strength of the 4 teams qualified for the semi finals, I was hoping that there are some tough matches in store in the semi finals. However, it turned out to be one sided and boring game as both New Zeland and South Africa miserably failed to perform to their potential.
2007-04-26 17:31:52 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New Zealand was the better team. they showed they had potential and weren't afraid to use it unlike SA. I'm really p*ssed of with SA at the moment. We didn't even try, I mean 149 all out? geez that's as low as you can if you're South Africa.
New Zealnand was the best no doubt,bro.
2007-04-25 20:43:57 · answer #5 · answered by peaches 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think new zealand is the better one bcos RSA r the better ones only in RSA abd out their country, south africa is nothing. They have good quality players like kallis , smith , pollock and other trade mark palyers but they cant deliver their best in the pitches across heir country. SO new zealand is the best
2007-04-25 20:53:53 · answer #6 · answered by saikrishna_viru 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New Zealand!
2007-04-25 22:51:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol u got a lil while to wait
dont hold your breath
new zealand r better than south africa
u must remember saffers lost to freakin BANGLADESH!!!
2007-04-25 20:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
new zealand
2007-04-26 19:06:49 · answer #9 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋