Most of us know Dante has been traded to the Rams for a 5th round pick, and they also swapped picks in Round 3...How do you think he will play these upcoming years, keep in mind, he's still only 28.(I think)
2007-04-25 18:58:52 · 13 answers · asked by JimmyDean 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think he'll fair ok. And they also plan on using him as a wide reciever at times. When I. Bruce no longer feels he can contribute, that's when Dante will be used more...
Imagine Holt, Bruce, and Dante in one of those famous "Out patterns", especially when you also have a strong back-field to support the "Wing-out"
2007-04-25 19:03:33 · answer #1 · answered by Jack 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he did! This occurred during the 2007 NFL Draft, where the KC Chiefs traded him to the St. Louis Rams for a 5th round pick. Hall should do better as a Ram, since they have a need at WR and the fact that they play on turf. The only problem is, he may be looking at being their 4th or 5th receiver on the depth charts.
2016-05-19 00:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Hall was an outstanding pick up for the Rams who were in dire need of a return man. Now the Rams can focus on their defense on draft day. I think Hall will excel on the fast playing turf of the Rams.
For more on the Rams, Chiefs and the NFL, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/
2007-04-25 19:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Rams return game stubk out loud last year, he'll help a lot in that department. He won't have another 6 TD year because he just doesn't get kicked to anymore, but he'll average 25+ yards per kick return and 14 + per punt return. Hes won't give you a whole lot as a reciever, mostly because of his size. Seemed the only routes he could ever get open on were quick slants and WR sreens.
2007-04-26 08:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by DoReidos 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I did not know Dante Hall went to the Rams. I say that was a good pick up. He is a fabulous returner, without injury I say he is a great addition to that team.
2007-04-25 19:12:26 · answer #5 · answered by t2shyfromphilly 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it benefits the Rams because of awful special teams in the past, but only in that respect. As a receiver, Hall has averaged less than 250 receiving yards the past three seasons. Remember, Trent Green threw for 4500 and 4000 yards in '04 and '05 and between him and Huard, threw for 3200 yards last season. Take it from a Seahawks fan, this move makes me nervous.
2007-04-25 21:26:20 · answer #6 · answered by howcrew_13 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He will be 29 in two months, I think this trade is good for both teams. Rams need a return man, and the chiefs are looking to get more players in the draft. Espn said teams are getting devin hester fever and are trying to get any return man they can get.
2007-04-25 21:22:19 · answer #7 · answered by Christopher S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it was a good deal for both, dont forget the rams just picked up drew bennett. so hall's role will be limited at wr. besides anything is better than the rams special teams over the past few years
2007-04-25 19:58:35 · answer #8 · answered by stlmike80 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even with a 5th round pick the Rams over paid for a aging KR whose best years are over (tough to call him a WR since his skills there are limited). Good deal for KC though
2007-04-25 19:08:58 · answer #9 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dante didn't lose his spark...he lost his blockers....as long the Rams get him a good squad to run behind, he'll be as electrifying as he was in 2003.
2007-04-27 03:26:19 · answer #10 · answered by Black_Beauty97 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋