Hillary Clinton..should she be the next president?

Question

Why are or why not?

Answer 1

Seriously, the most powerful office in the world?

Wouldn't you like to see about 20 more years of experience out of her?

She was the WIFE of a governor, the WIFE of a president, and a senator for 1 full term.

That's it.

Hell, I have more experience than she does!

Answer 2

What concerns me is American voters cast aside candidate qualifications and vote someone in because the candidate is female or black. If we vote on popularity or frivolity---we're asking for a HUGE helping of troubles on our plate....and don't we have enough ineptness in the White House right now, having to put up with Bush????

I don't feel Hillary should become president because she can't make firm fast decisions. Ah, life gets different being called to MAKE decisions as opposed to INFLUENCING them. And her influence when hubby Bill was prez wasn't all that great, either---save for getting "political correctness" and "sexual harrassment" issues into serious social standings.

On record once advocating Bush's move to War, now she denounces it because it's a FAVORED social viewpoint---we're NOT getting the true Hillary. I think she'll be worse a president than hubby Bill was.

No....Hillary is just fine right where she is.

Answer 3

First of all, I will pronounce that I'm a pure democrat, but I do not wish people take what I say to their heart, and I do wish they make decisions based upon what they feel. The reason why you see posts such as: "NO.. Hillary is a blah blah blah..." and so on, is because die heart conservatives are trying to exploit our fine candidates for president. And generally, without completely demoralizing the republicans, the conservatives are typically either: "arrogant white males, raised on a farm" or "clueless religious bond ridiculer"... not saying all republicans are so, only those that wish to bash on candidates just for exposure. So, without further ado, I shall proclaim why Hillary should be our next president.

For one, our country (as great as you may think), is not so great. For the first part, a male dominant run country is not good. Especially that of one that knows absolutely nothing, for example Mr. President. Our country needs a executive branch reform, we need to show the world that we're ready for equal opportunity and are a strong believer in what we say "women can do just as well as men." So therefore, if not Hillary, then make it another woman.

Second, we need money, money, and definitely money. Am I the only person that sees that the United States is in a sufficient amount of debt. Am I the only one that sees the dollar is near worthless? Am I the only one that sees that a debt in the trade with China is catastrophic to our economy? I'm assuming I'm not the only one, but if I'm not, then why do I still see people saying that we need Bush to support a flawed war? Maybe... just maybe, it's not even Bush who's doing this. Maybe it's his vice president and cabinet? Maybe we're just having a "mediator," if so, a poor one. We need an assertive president, one with both political success in Washington, and influential success. One with knowledge of a scholar, not one of an average "C" student. Hillary Clinton will get the job done with both her education in Washington, and her studied education, along with her husband (President Clinton).

Lastly, a war in Iraq was a useless fight. Being clueless of wartime, and having the worst generals in history, President Bush was only successful in "fooling" Congress into funding the war. He had no success in Iraq... we know that, the world knows that, and he knows that. Yet he only goes there so he can step up to his father, and show his father he can go into a war, and maybe (if lucky) win. But it's not going to happen with no one else's support. Yet we see that we need a president not only who will step out of Iraq but put stability. We can't just jump out of Iraq fast, we must slowly take troops away, and maybe even re-install a monarchy there. It proved to work with Sadam. In these third world countries, democracies don't work. Democracies take time to develop and evolve to a conclusion. Dictators can make split second choices, something needed in the Middle East where wealth is not dispersed. I feel Hillary will get this done.

But besides that, why did we even go to Iraq (directed to the republican genre)? Bush wanted to be a "hero." Our real threat was in Afghanistan, where after months, our attention was deferred, and we lost interest in there. That's the real threat to America, and I feel a Clinton success will show that this country will be the new focus.

Answer 4

Hillary Clinton is a good senator but lacks the moral ascendancy due to her tolerance of the philandering of Bill Clinton. Anyway, she has the intelligence and experience to become a President.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

Answer 5

Define, "should". Nobody is "owed" the Presidency (except perhaps for Al Gore- but that's the Answer to another Question... :) ). Hillary, Barack, Rudy, John (1 & 2), Mitt, & all the rest- are going to have to EARN it, over the next 19 months. Personally I'll vote for anyone who can tell me WHEN we're going to be out of Iraq by. 4 years of "when we're victorious"- with no end in sight, -is enough.

Answer 6

Hillary is a good politician, but she should not be elected president. In this uncertain world with nuclear threats from North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and China we need a real leader and not a politician. Bush hasn't been perfect and I think he could have done a better response to 9/11, but to go polar opposite with a female Democrat who is only going to be elected because she is a woman and a former First Lady would be a terrible mistake.

Answer 7

The government of the last twenty years both democrat and republican is the reason jobs are leaving the country, global warming has not been addressed and the rest of the world hates us. We need new leadership not a North American Union for the USA. No more Bush's or Clinton's.

Answer 8

Hillary Clinton has to my knowledge never made a stand about anything, who knows where she stands on any issue? What are her views? She only makes a stand when everything is over and she knows exactly which side to be on. She stands for nothing (with the exception of universal health care) that I am aware of. I want to know where the candidates stand on issues.

Answer 9

Hillary is a carpet bagging southerner that lives in the 60's and has no concept about the global war that the western world is resisting instead of fighting.

Hillary is like the the ROTC or USMA female cadet who slows down an entire company of Airborne warriors in jump school because she can't keep up.

If she gets elected the world will be a homogeneous EU.

What was your question?

Answer 10

That's a sick thought.

She's already been in the White House for 8 years, influencing the country in a detrimental manner. Now she and her awful husband will be back in there again?

There should be a law against this, and I honestly believe the founders must have not thought about such a horrible situation when writing the Constitution. I think that we need an amendment forbidding it.

Generally speaking, however, she's a dedicated Socialist who will raise taxes and implement every rotten liberal program there is. The Bill of Rights could become defunct, and your rights that you take for granted could go out the window.

You people don't have any idea of what you're getting into. If this hideous woman gets elected, it could be because of the women's right to vote, and women abusing it.

Answer 11

NO!

1) I don't think this country will elect a female President, especially not in a time of war.

2) We are currently having enough problems with Middle Eastern states. We know their views on women. She knows this because she discovered how the Taliban treated women during their rule. How can we get these countries to have peace talks with us when they view our leader as a lower class?